Literature DB >> 16219997

The eye of the laboratory mouse remains anatomically adapted for natural conditions.

Jonathan M Shupe1, Deborah M Kristan, Steven N Austad, Deborah L Stenkamp.   

Abstract

Evolutionary effects of domestication have been demonstrated for several body systems, including the eye, and for several vertebrate species, including the mouse. Given the importance of the laboratory mouse to vision science, we wished to determine whether the anatomical and histological features of the eyes of laboratory mice are distinct from those of their naturally adapted, wild counterparts. We measured dimensions and masses of whole eyes and lenses from a wild population plus three inbred strains (C57BL/6J, NZB/BINJ, and DBA/1J) of the house house, Mus musculus, as well as wild and outbred laboratory-domesticated stock of the deer mouse, Peromyscus maniculatus. Histological preparations from these eyes were used to determine outer nuclear layer thickness, linear density of the ganglion cell layer, and for indirect immunofluorescence evaluation of cone opsin expression. For all of these traits, no statistically significant differences were found between any laboratory strain and its wild counterpart. The evolutionary effects of domestication of mice therefore do not include changes to the eye in any variable measured, supporting the continued use of this animal as a model for a naturally adapted visual system. (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16219997      PMCID: PMC2582157          DOI: 10.1159/000088857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Behav Evol        ISSN: 0006-8977            Impact factor:   1.808


  40 in total

Review 1.  Stationary night blindness or progressive retinal degeneration in mice carrying different alleles of PDE gamma.

Authors:  Debora B Farber; Stephen H Tsang
Journal:  Front Biosci       Date:  2003-05-01

2.  Exploration and risk assessment: a comparative study of male house mice (Mus musculus musculus) and two laboratory strains.

Authors:  Hanna Augustsson; Bengt J Meyerson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2004-06

3.  The optics of comparative ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  C J Murphy; H C Howland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Ganglion cell distribution in the retina of the mouse.

Authors:  U C Dräger; J F Olsen
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  A paraxial schematic eye model for the growing C57BL/6 mouse.

Authors:  Christine Schmucker; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Canine visual acuity: retinal and cortical field potentials evoked by pattern stimulation.

Authors:  J V Odom; N M Bromberg; W W Dawson
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1983-11

7.  Genetic control of melatonin synthesis in the pineal gland of the mouse.

Authors:  S Ebihara; T Marks; D J Hudson; M Menaker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1986-01-31       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Measurement of refractive state and deprivation myopia in two strains of mice.

Authors:  Frank Schaeffel; Eva Burkhardt; Howard C Howland; Robert W Williams
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Melatonin content of the pineal gland in different mouse strains.

Authors:  M Goto; I Oshima; T Tomita; S Ebihara
Journal:  J Pineal Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 13.007

10.  Extraretinal and retinal hedgehog signaling sequentially regulate retinal differentiation in zebrafish.

Authors:  Deborah L Stenkamp; Ruth A Frey
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 3.582

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Have we achieved a unified model of photoreceptor cell fate specification in vertebrates?

Authors:  Ruben Adler; Pamela A Raymond
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Stable Representations of Decision Variables for Flexible Behavior.

Authors:  Bilal A Bari; Cooper D Grossman; Emily E Lubin; Adithya E Rajagopalan; Jianna I Cressy; Jeremiah Y Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-07-04       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Targeted effects of retinoic acid signaling upon photoreceptor development in zebrafish.

Authors:  Shubhangi N Prabhudesai; David A Cameron; Deborah L Stenkamp
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Modulation of p75(NTR) prevents diabetes- and proNGF-induced retinal inflammation and blood-retina barrier breakdown in mice and rats.

Authors:  Barbara A Mysona; Mohammed M H Al-Gayyar; Suraporn Matragoon; Mohammed A Abdelsaid; Mona F El-Azab; H Uri Saragovi; Azza B El-Remessy
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 10.122

5.  Non-contact measurement of linear external dimensions of the mouse eye.

Authors:  Jeffrey Wisard; Micah A Chrenek; Charles Wright; Nupur Dalal; Machelle T Pardue; Jeffrey H Boatright; John M Nickerson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 6.  Neurogenesis in the fish retina.

Authors:  Deborah L Stenkamp
Journal:  Int Rev Cytol       Date:  2007

7.  Transcriptional neoteny in the human brain.

Authors:  Mehmet Somel; Henriette Franz; Zheng Yan; Anna Lorenc; Song Guo; Thomas Giger; Janet Kelso; Birgit Nickel; Michael Dannemann; Sabine Bahn; Maree J Webster; Cynthia S Weickert; Michael Lachmann; Svante Pääbo; Philipp Khaitovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-23       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Light and the laboratory mouse.

Authors:  Stuart N Peirson; Laurence A Brown; Carina A Pothecary; Lindsay A Benson; Angus S Fisk
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 9.  Optogenetic Gene Therapy for the Degenerate Retina: Recent Advances.

Authors:  Michelle E McClements; Federica Staurenghi; Robert E MacLaren; Jasmina Cehajic-Kapetanovic
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Retinal cone photoreceptors of the deer mouse Peromyscus maniculatus: development, topography, opsin expression and spectral tuning.

Authors:  Patrick Arbogast; Martin Glösmann; Leo Peichl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.