Literature DB >> 16219879

Comorbidity and survival disparities among black and white patients with breast cancer.

C Martin Tammemagi1, David Nerenz, Christine Neslund-Dudas, Carolyn Feldkamp, David Nathanson.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Reasons for the shorter survival of black breast cancer patients compared with their white counterparts are not completely understood.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of comorbidity in this racial disparity among breast cancer patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Historical cohort from the Henry Ford Health System (a large comprehensive health system in Detroit, Mich) followed up for a median of 10 years. Patients (n = 906) included 264 black (29.1%) and 642 white (70.9%) women diagnosed as having breast cancer between 1985 and 1990. Detailed comorbidity data (268 comorbidities) and study data were abstracted from medical records and institutional, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results, and Michigan State registries. Associations were analyzed with logistic and Cox regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Breast cancer recurrence/progression and survival to death from all, breast cancer, and competing (non-breast cancer) causes.
RESULTS: Of blacks, 64 (24.9%) died of breast cancer and 95 (37.0%) died of competing causes. Comparable data for whites were 115 (18.3%) and 202 (32.1%). Blacks had worse all-cause survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.62), breast cancer-specific survival (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.08-2.00), and competing-causes survival (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.00-1.63). A total of 77 adverse comorbidities were associated with reduced survival. Adverse comorbidity count was associated with all-cause (adjusted HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.19-1.40) and competing-causes survival but was not associated with recurrence/progression or breast cancer-specific survival. At least 1 adverse comorbidity was observed in 221 (86.0%) blacks and 407 (65.7%) whites (odds ratio, 3.20; 95% CI, 2.17-4.72). Comparisons of unadjusted and comorbidity-adjusted HRs indicated that adverse comorbidity explained 49.1% of all-cause and 76.7% of competing-causes survival disparity. Diabetes and hypertension were particularly important in explaining disparity.
CONCLUSIONS: More black breast cancer patients die of competing causes than of breast cancer. Effective control of comorbidity in black breast cancer patients should help improve life expectancy and lead to a reduction in survival disparities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16219879     DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.14.1765

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  165 in total

1.  Does social selection explain the association between state-level racial animus and racial disparities in self-rated health in the United States?

Authors:  Sarah McKetta; Mark L Hatzenbuehler; Charissa Pratt; Lisa Bates; Bruce G Link; Katherine M Keyes
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.797

2.  Development and Evaluation of the Curriculum for BOLD (Bronx Oncology Living Daily) Healthy Living: a Diabetes Prevention and Control Program for Underserved Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Beth A Conlon; Michelle Kahan; Melissa Martinez; Kathleen Isaac; Amerigo Rossi; Rebecca Skyhart; Judith Wylie-Rosett; Alyson Moadel-Robblee
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Quality of care for breast cancer for uninsured women in california under the breast and cervical cancer prevention treatment act.

Authors:  Jennifer L Malin; Allison L Diamant; Barbara Leake; Yihang Liu; Amardeep Thind; Katherine L Kahn; Eric C Schneider; Arnold M Epstein; Rose C Maly
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Race and subset analyses in clinical trials: time to get serious about data integration.

Authors:  Blase N Polite; Brooke E Sylvester; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Disparities in oncologic surgery.

Authors:  Caprice C Greenberg; Jane C Weeks; Steven C Stain
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Preventing weight gain in African American breast cancer survivors using smart scales and activity trackers: a randomized controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Carmina G Valle; Allison M Deal; Deborah F Tate
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.442

7.  Racial/ethnic differences in clinical trial enrollment, refusal rates, ineligibility, and reasons for decline among patients at sites in the National Cancer Institute's Community Cancer Centers Program.

Authors:  Aisha T Langford; Ken Resnicow; Eileen P Dimond; Andrea M Denicoff; Diane St Germain; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Rebecca A Enos; Angela Carrigan; Kathy Wilkinson; Ronald S Go
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  The Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors (ROCS) Pilot Study: A Focus on Outcomes after Cancer in a Racially Diverse Patient Population.

Authors:  Jennifer L Beebe-Dimmer; Terrance L Albrecht; Tara E Baird; Julie J Ruterbusch; Theresa Hastert; Felicity W K Harper; Michael S Simon; Judith Abrams; Kendra L Schwartz; Ann G Schwartz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Physical activity barriers and resources among black women with a history of breast and endometrial cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Natasha R Burse; Nishat Bhuiyan; Scherezade K Mama; Kathryn H Schmitz
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2020-04-02       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 10.  Body composition changes in females treated for breast cancer: a review of the evidence.

Authors:  Patricia M Sheean; Kent Hoskins; Melinda Stolley
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 4.872

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.