Literature DB >> 16219573

Minimal residual disease monitoring in multiple myeloma: a comparison between allelic-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and flow cytometry.

María Eugenia Sarasquete1, Ramón García-Sanz, David González, Joaquín Martínez, Gema Mateo, Pilar Martínez, José Maria Ribera, José Mariano Hernández, Juan José Lahuerta, Alberto Orfão, Marcos González, Jesus F San Miguel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Minimal residual disease (MRD) studies are useful in multiple myeloma (MM). However, the definition of the best technique and clinical utility are still unresolved issues. The aim of this study was to analyze and compare the clinical utility of MRD studies in MM with two different techniques: allelic-specific oligonucleotide real-time quantitative PCR (ASO-RQ-PCR), and flow cytometry (FCM). DESIGN AND METHODS: Bone marrow samples from 32 MM patients who had achieved complete response after transplantation were evaluated by ASO-RQ-PCR, using TaqMan technology, and multiparametric FCM.
RESULTS: ASO-RQ-PCR was only applicable in 75% of patients for a variety of technical reasons, while FCM was applicable in up to 90%. Therefore, simultaneous PCR/FCM analysis was possible in only 24 patients. The number of residual tumor cells identified by both techniques was very similar (mean=0.29%, range=0.001-1.61%, correlation coefficient=0.861). However, RQ-PCR was able to detect residual myelomatous cells in 17 patients while FCM only did so in 11; thus, 6 cases were FCM negative but PCR positive, all of them displaying a very low number of clonal cells (median=0.014%, range=0.001-0.11). Using an MRD threshold of 0.01% (10(-4)) two risk groups with significantly different progression-free survival could be identified by either PCR (34 vs. 15m, p=0.04) or FCM (27 vs. 10m, p=0.05). INTERPRETATION AND
CONCLUSIONS: Although MRD evaluation by ASO-RQ-PCR is slightly more sensitive and specific than FCM, it is applicable in a lower proportion of MM patients and is more time-consuming, while both techniques provide similar prognostic information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16219573

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haematologica        ISSN: 0390-6078            Impact factor:   9.941


  44 in total

1.  A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Dominik Dytfeld; Kent A Griffith; Daniel Lebovic; David H Vesole; Sundar Jagannath; Ammar Al-Zoubi; Tara Anderson; Brian Nordgren; Kristen Detweiler-Short; Keith Stockerl-Goldstein; Asra Ahmed; Terri Jobkar; Diane E Durecki; Kathryn McDonnell; Melissa Mietzel; Daniel Couriel; Mark Kaminski; Ravi Vij
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Clinical impact of immunophenotypic remission after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  L Giaccone; L Brunello; M Festuccia; M Gilestro; E Maffini; F Ferrando; E Talamo; R Passera; M Boccadoro; P Omedè; B Bruno
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.483

3.  Multiparameter flow cytometric remission is the most relevant prognostic factor for multiple myeloma patients who undergo autologous stem cell transplantation.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Maria-Belén Vidriales; Jorge Cerveró; Gema Mateo; Jose J Pérez; Maria A Montalbán; Anna Sureda; Laura Montejano; Norma C Gutiérrez; Alfonso García de Coca; Natalia de Las Heras; Maria V Mateos; Maria C López-Berges; Raimundo García-Boyero; Josefina Galende; Jose Hernández; Luis Palomera; Dolores Carrera; Rafael Martínez; Javier de la Rubia; Alejandro Martín; Joan Bladé; Juan J Lahuerta; Alberto Orfao; Jesús F San Miguel
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-07-31       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Nikhil C Munshi; Kenneth C Anderson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Can multiple myeloma become a curable disease?

Authors:  Jesús F San-Miguel; María-Victoria Mateos
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 9.941

6.  The predominant myeloma clone at diagnosis, CDR3 defined, is constantly detectable across all stages of disease evolution.

Authors:  N Puig; I Conde; C Jiménez; M E Sarasquete; A Balanzategui; M Alcoceba; J Quintero; M C Chillón; E Sebastián; R Corral; L Marín; N C Gutiérrez; M-V Mateos; M González-Díaz; J F San-Miguel; R García-Sanz
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 11.528

Review 7.  Minimal residual disease testing after stem cell transplantation for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  A M Sherrod; P Hari; C A Mosse; R C Walker; R F Cornell
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 8.  New criteria for response assessment: role of minimal residual disease in multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Bruno Paiva; Jacques J M van Dongen; Alberto Orfao
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 9.  Clinical utility of recently identified diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular biomarkers in mature B-cell neoplasms.

Authors:  Arantza Onaindia; L Jeffrey Medeiros; Keyur P Patel
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 7.842

10.  Cancer testis antigen MAGE C1 can be used to monitor levels of circulating malignant stem cells in the peripheral blood of multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Karen Shires; Kirsty Wienand
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 4.553

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.