Literature DB >> 16219524

Comparison between monofilament and multifilament polypropylene tapes in urinary incontinence.

Abdolreza Bafghi1, Laure Valerio, Emmanuel Isaac Benizri, Cynthia Trastour, Eric Jacob Benizri, André Bongain.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We compare the efficacy and late complications between a polypropylene monofilament tape (TVT) and a polypropylene multifilament tape (IVS) in the surgical implant of sub-urethral, tension free tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI).
METHODS: It is a non-randomised, monocentric retrospective study. Two questionnaires were sent to the patients. The first questionnaire determined the efficacy of the tape and the tolerance of the urinary process. The second questionnaire evaluated discomfort and consequences linked to urinary incontinence and associated urinary troubles.
RESULTS: The study included 313 female patients and 256 (82%) responded to the questionnaire (137 TVT, 119 IVS). Patient satisfaction was 88.3% for the TVT tape and 73.5% for the IVS tape (p < 0.005). The improvement of the quality of life was also higher for the polypropylene monofilament tapes. "De novo" urge incontinence was more common in the TVT group. However, the rates of dysuria and infection of tapes were more common in the IVS group.
CONCLUSION: The type of tape appears to influence efficacy and the emergence of late complications. Our results point at the greater efficacy of the polypropylene monofilament tape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16219524     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  Tension-free vaginal tape: what it's made of can matter!

Authors:  N D Kroon; K M Smith
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-06-01

2.  Long-term outcomes of TVT and IVS operations for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: monofilament vs. multifilament polypropylene tape.

Authors:  Jens Christian Prien-Larsen; Lars Hemmingsen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-03-10

Review 3.  Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; C Huub van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-16

4.  Prepubic and thigh abscess after successive placement of two suburethral slings.

Authors:  X Deffieux; A C Donnadieu; M Mordefroid; S Levante; R Frydman; H Fernandez
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-07-11

5.  Polypropylene as a reinforcement in pelvic surgery is not inert: comparative analysis of 100 explants.

Authors:  Arnaud Clavé; Hannah Yahi; Jean-Claude Hammou; Suzelei Montanari; Pierre Gounon; Henri Clavé
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Long-term follow-up of intravaginal slingplasty operation for urinary stress incontinence.

Authors:  Karin Glavind; Thomas Larsen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-03-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.