Literature DB >> 16219059

Automatic feedback control of relative blood volume changes during hemodialysis improves blood pressure stability during and after dialysis.

Casper F M Franssen1, Judith J Dasselaar, Paulina Sytsma, Johannes G M Burgerhof, Paul E de Jong, Roel M Huisman.   

Abstract

Automatic feedback systems have been designed to control relative blood volume changes during hemodialysis (HD) as hypovolemia plays a major role in the development of dialysis hypotension. Of these systems, one is based on the concept of blood volume tracking (BVT). BVT has been shown to improve intra-HD hemodynamic stability. We first questioned whether BVT also improves post-HD blood pressure stability in hypotension-prone patients and second, whether BVT is effective in reducing the post-HD weight as many hypotension-prone patients are overhydrated because of an inability to reach dry weight. After a 3-week period on standard HD, 12 hypotension-prone patients were treated with two consecutive BVT treatment protocols. During the first BVT period of 3 weeks, the post-HD target weight was kept identical compared with the standard HD period (BVT-constant weight; BVT-cw). During the second BVT period of 6 weeks, we gradually tried to lower the post-HD target weight (BVT-reduced weight; BVT-rw). In the last week of each period, we studied intra-HD and 24 hr post-HD blood pressure behavior by ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM). Pre- and post-HD weight did not differ between standard HD and either BVT-cw or BVT-rw. Heart size on a standing pre-dialysis chest X-ray did not change significantly throughout the study. There were less episodes of dialysis hypotension during BVT compared with standard HD (both BVT periods: p<0.01). ABPM data were complete in 10 patients. During the first 16 hr post-HD, systolic blood pressure was significantly higher with BVT in comparison with standard HD (both BVT periods: p<0.05). The use of BVT in hypotension-prone patients is associated with higher systolic blood pressures for as long as 16 hr post-HD. BVT was not effective in reducing the post-HD target weight in this patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16219059     DOI: 10.1111/j.1492-7535.2005.01157.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hemodial Int        ISSN: 1492-7535            Impact factor:   1.812


  9 in total

1.  Model predictive control of relative blood volume and heart rate during hemodialysis.

Authors:  Faizan Javed; Andrey V Savkin; Gregory S H Chan; Paul M Middleton; Philip Malouf; Elizabeth Steel; James Mackie; Teddy M Cheng
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Evaluation of intradialytic hypotension using impedance cardiography.

Authors:  Abed Bayya; Dvora Rubinger; David Michael Linton; Sigal Sviri
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  The Prevalence of Intradialytic Hypotension in Patients on Conventional Hemodialysis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Johanna Kuipers; Loes M Verboom; Karin J R Ipema; Wolter Paans; Wim P Krijnen; Carlo A J M Gaillard; Ralf Westerhuis; Casper F M Franssen
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.754

4.  Blood-volume monitoring in paediatric haemodialysis.

Authors:  Daljit K Hothi; Elizabeth Harvey; Christina M Goia; Denis Geary
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.714

5.  Blood volume-monitored regulation of ultrafiltration in fluid-overloaded hemodialysis patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Manfred Hecking; Marlies Antlanger; Wolfgang Winnicki; Thomas Reiter; Johannes Werzowa; Michael Haidinger; Thomas Weichhart; Hans-Dietrich Polaschegg; Peter Josten; Isabella Exner; Katharina Lorenz-Turnheim; Manfred Eigner; Gernot Paul; Renate Klauser-Braun; Walter H Hörl; Gere Sunder-Plassmann; Marcus D Säemann
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.279

6.  Prevalence of intradialytic hypotension, clinical symptoms and nursing interventions--a three-months, prospective study of 3818 haemodialysis sessions.

Authors:  Johanna Kuipers; Jurjen K Oosterhuis; Wim P Krijnen; Judith J Dasselaar; Carlo A J M Gaillard; Ralf Westerhuis; Casper F M Franssen
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2016-02-27       Impact factor: 2.388

7.  Effect of plasma sodium concentration on blood pressure regulators during hemodialysis: a randomized crossover study.

Authors:  Esmée M Ettema; Johanna Kuipers; Martijn van Faassen; Henk Groen; Arie M van Roon; Joop D Lefrandt; Ralf Westerhuis; Ido P Kema; Harry van Goor; Ron T Gansevoort; Carlo A J M Gaillard; Casper F M Franssen
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.388

8.  Efficacy of hemocontrol biofeedback system in intradialytic hypotension-prone hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Hyo-Wook Gil; Kitae Bang; So Young Lee; Byoung Geun Han; Jin Kuk Kim; Young Ok Kim; Ho Cheol Song; Young Joo Kwon; Yong-Soo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Effect of intradialytic change in blood pressure and ultrafiltration volume on the variation in access flow measured by ultrasound dilution.

Authors:  Hoon Suk Park; Seok Hui Kang; Byung Ha Chung; Bum Soon Choi; Cheol Whee Park; Chul Woo Yang; Yong-Soo Kim
Journal:  Kidney Res Clin Pract       Date:  2012-12-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.