S Girard1, F Paqué, M Badertscher, B Sener, M Zehnder. 1. Department of Preventive Dentistry, Periodontology, and Cariology, University of Zürich Center for Dental Medicine, Zürich, Switzerland.
Abstract
AIM: To test an aqueous gel containing 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-bisphosphonate (HEBP) regarding its interactions with sodium hypochlorite, its calcium binding capacity, and its potential in preventing the formation of a smear layer when used in conjunction with rotary root canal preparation. METHODOLOGY: The experimental aqueous gel consisted of (w/v) 2% alginate, 3% aerosil, 10% Tween 80 and 18% HEBP. Interactions of gel components with hypochlorite were assessed using iodometric titration and monochromatic ultraviolet spectrometry. Two commercial paste-type chelators containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and peroxide (RC-Prep and Glyde) served as controls. Calcium-binding capacities were measured in mixtures with a Ca2+ standard solution buffered at pH 10 using a calcium-selective measuring chain. Finally, root canals of 16 extracted single-rooted premolars per group were instrumented using ProFile instruments dipped in the experimental gel, RC-Prep, or nothing. Additionally, canals were rinsed with 10 mL of a 1% NaOCl solution during/after preparation. Smear scores in instrumented teeth were monitored using scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: None of the experimental gel components showed short-term interactions with hypochlorite, whilst EDTA, peroxide, RC-Prep and Glyde immediately reduced the hypochlorite in solution. The experimental gel chelated 30 mg Ca2+ g-1, compared with 16 mg Ca2+ g-1 and 11 mg Ca2+ g-1 chelated by RC-Prep and Glyde respectively. Smear scores obtained with the experimental gel were significantly (P<0.05) lower than with RC-Prep in coronal and middle root thirds, whilst no differences were observed in apical root thirds. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, an HEBP gel appeared advantageous over currently available products.
AIM: To test an aqueous gel containing 1-hydroxyethylidene-1, 1-bisphosphonate (HEBP) regarding its interactions with sodium hypochlorite, its calcium binding capacity, and its potential in preventing the formation of a smear layer when used in conjunction with rotary root canal preparation. METHODOLOGY: The experimental aqueous gel consisted of (w/v) 2% alginate, 3% aerosil, 10% Tween 80 and 18% HEBP. Interactions of gel components with hypochlorite were assessed using iodometric titration and monochromatic ultraviolet spectrometry. Two commercial paste-type chelators containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and peroxide (RC-Prep and Glyde) served as controls. Calcium-binding capacities were measured in mixtures with a Ca2+ standard solution buffered at pH 10 using a calcium-selective measuring chain. Finally, root canals of 16 extracted single-rooted premolars per group were instrumented using ProFile instruments dipped in the experimental gel, RC-Prep, or nothing. Additionally, canals were rinsed with 10 mL of a 1% NaOCl solution during/after preparation. Smear scores in instrumented teeth were monitored using scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: None of the experimental gel components showed short-term interactions with hypochlorite, whilst EDTA, peroxide, RC-Prep and Glyde immediately reduced the hypochlorite in solution. The experimental gel chelated 30 mg Ca2+ g-1, compared with 16 mg Ca2+ g-1 and 11 mg Ca2+ g-1 chelated by RC-Prep and Glyde respectively. Smear scores obtained with the experimental gel were significantly (P<0.05) lower than with RC-Prep in coronal and middle root thirds, whilst no differences were observed in apical root thirds. CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, an HEBP gel appeared advantageous over currently available products.