Literature DB >> 16218901

Breast cancer and ovarian cancer genetics.

Richard F Edlich1, Kathryne L Winters, Kant Y Lin.   

Abstract

Breast and ovarian cancers are the second and fifth leading causes of cancer death, respectively, among women in the United States. Individuals with breast cancer have a 20--30% chance of having at least one relative with the disease. However, only 5--10% of the cases are a direct result of germline mutations in highly penetrable genes, such as BRCA1 and BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) as well as genes TP53 and PTEN. Since 1996, genetic testing for these mutations has been clinically available. A strategy for the management of women at increased familial risk of breast and ovarian cancers is described, which includes genetic assessment, chemoprevention, radiologic screening, and clinical and self-examination. Genetic testing should occur within a cancer genetic clinic after genetic counseling. A blood sample allows determination of the presence of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, the TP53 gene, the PTEN gene, and the ATM gene. Tumor examination has identified a growth factor receptor gene, human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER-2). With regard to diet and lifestyle, women at increased risk of breast cancer could be advised to reduce dietary fat, avoid obesity, decrease alcohol consumption, and take regular exercise. Although chemoprotection is a valuable consideration, it is important to emphasize that the use of Tamoxifen in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers is not established, nor is the optimum duration of benefit. An overview of the main outcomes of the current published studies confirms a 38% decrease in breast cancer incidence with Tamoxifen but recommends its use be restricted to women at high risk of breast cancer and low risk for potential side effects. The role of bilateral risk-reducing mastectomy or prophylactic mastectomy has been controversial for several reasons, including the psychosocial significance of the breast in Western cultures, the wide acceptance of breast conservation in surgery for early breast cancer, and the previous lack of data on its efficacy. The surgical procedure should aim to remove substantially all at-risk breast tissue. However, there is a balance between reduction of cancer risk and cosmetic outcome. Bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy can significantly decrease ovarian cancer risk in women who carry BCRA1 mutations. Oophorectomy lowers the risk of breast cancer, even in women who have previously used hormone replacement therapy. There are no published randomized controlled trials examining the effectiveness of mammographic screening in women under 50 years of age with a family history of breast cancer. However, the published studies do suggest that mammographic screening of a high-risk group of women under 50 years of age may detect cancer at a rate equivalent to that seen in women 10 years older with normal risk. Other initial studies also support MRI as having a greater sensitivity than mammography in high-risk women. Breast clinical and self-examination is often advocated, but its effectiveness is unproved, and only one randomized study has been undertaken in women at risk. On the basis of this study as well as one nonrandomized study, it can be concluded that clinical examination as well as mammography are essential in detecting breast cancer. under 50 years of age with a family history of breast cancer. However, the published studies do suggest that mammographic screening of a high-risk group of women under 50 years of age may detect cancer at a rate equivalent to that seen in women 10 years older with normal risk. Other initial studies also support MRI as having a greater sensitivity than mammography in high-risk women. Breast clinical and self-examination is often advocated, but its effectiveness is unproved, and only one randomized study has been undertaken in women at risk. On the basis of this study as well as one nonrandomized study, it can be concluded that clinical examination as well as mammography are essential in detecting breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16218901     DOI: 10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v15.i5.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Long Term Eff Med Implants        ISSN: 1050-6934


  12 in total

Review 1.  Genetic and epigenetic biomarkers in cancer : improving diagnosis, risk assessment, and disease stratification.

Authors:  Mukesh Verma; Daniela Seminara; Fernando J Arena; Christy John; Kumiko Iwamoto; Virginia Hartmuller
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Estrogen receptor alpha (ERS1) SNPs c454-397T>C (PvuII) and c454-351A>G (XbaI) are risk biomarkers for breast cancer development.

Authors:  Klesia Pirola Madeira; Renata Dalmaschio Daltoé; Gabriela Modenesi Sirtoli; Alex Assis Carvalho; Leticia Batista Azevedo Rangel; Ian Victor Silva
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.316

3.  Rare BRCA1 haplotypes including 3'UTR SNPs associated with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Cory Pelletier; William C Speed; Trupti Paranjape; Katie Keane; Rachel Blitzblau; Antoinette Hollestelle; Kyan Safavi; Ans van den Ouweland; Daniel Zelterman; Frank J Slack; Kenneth K Kidd; Joanne B Weidhaas
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 4.  Inequities in genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer: implications for public health practice.

Authors:  Ambreen Sayani
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2018-05-20

5.  Ectopic expression of tethered human follicle-stimulating hormone (hFSH) gene in transgenic mice.

Authors:  Myoung Ok Kim; Sung Hyun Kim; Sang Ryeul Lee; Mi Jung Shin; Kwan Sik Min; Dong Beom Lee; Sung Won Lee; Kil Soo Kim; Sun Jung Kim; Zae Young Ryoo
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 2.788

6.  Second malignancies in breast cancer patients following radiotherapy: a study in Florence, Italy.

Authors:  Wei Zhang; Aldo Becciolini; Annibale Biggeri; Paolo Pacini; Colin R Muirhead
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2011-04-04       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  A Pilot study of the Sharing Risk Information Tool (ShaRIT) for Families with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome.

Authors:  Ani Kardashian; Julia Fehniger; Jennifer Creasman; Eleanor Cheung; Mary Stanley Beattie
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 2.857

8.  DNA damage response markers are differentially expressed in BRCA-mutated breast cancers.

Authors:  Mohammed Aleskandarany; Daniela Caracappa; Christopher C Nolan; R Douglas Macmillan; Ian O Ellis; Emad A Rakha; Andrew R Green
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Database for exploration of functional context of genes implicated in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Mandeep Kaur; Aleksandar Radovanovic; Magbubah Essack; Ulf Schaefer; Monique Maqungo; Tracey Kibler; Sebastian Schmeier; Alan Christoffels; Kothandaraman Narasimhan; Mahesh Choolani; Vladimir B Bajic
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Family history of breast cancer and young age at diagnosis of breast cancer increase risk of second primary malignancies in women: a population-based cohort study.

Authors:  M Prochazka; P Hall; F Granath; K Czene
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.