Literature DB >> 1621860

Sham feeding in intact and chronic decerebrate rats.

H J Grill1, J M Kaplan.   

Abstract

In the traditional sham-feeding paradigm, the amount of sugar solution consumed by the rat is influenced by its concentration and the open or closed condition of the gastric fistula. The present experiments examine: 1) whether sham intake effects obtained under the "intraoral intake" paradigm, developed to explore controls of ingestion in otherwise aphagic preparations such as the decerebrate, are similar to those of previous studies in which intact rats obtained the fluid stimulus by spout licking; and 2) whether chronic decerebrate and intact rats show a similar elevation of their sucrose intake when ingesting with an open (sham intake) vs. closed gastric fistula. Experiment 1 showed that sham intraoral intake exceeded intake in the closed condition only for sucrose concentrations greater than 0.1 M. After it was established that the results obtained with the intraoral paradigm were consistent with those reported in the literature, the new paradigm was applied to the chronic decerebrate rat in experiment 2 to determine whether forebrain structures are necessary for sham-feeding effects. The effect of sucrose concentration and fistula condition on the behavior of chronic decerebrates was similar to that of intact rats. Like intact rats, decerebrate rats consumed more sucrose in the open condition but only for concentrations exceeding 0.1 M. This concentration-dependent sham sucrose intake of chronic decerebrate rats provides compelling evidence that the integration of sucrose's taste and postingestive effects that modulates ingestive behavior can be accomplished by the caudal brain stem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1621860     DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.1992.262.6.R1070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  6 in total

1.  Differential activation of chemically identified neurons in the caudal nucleus of the solitary tract in non-entrained rats after intake of satiating vs. non-satiating meals.

Authors:  Alison D Kreisler; Elizabeth A Davis; Linda Rinaman
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-02-06

Review 2.  Homeostatic and non-homeostatic controls of feeding behavior: Distinct vs. common neural systems.

Authors:  Clarissa M Liu; Scott E Kanoski
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-02-05

Review 3.  Physiologic and Neural Controls of Eating.

Authors:  Timothy H Moran; Ellen E Ladenheim
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.806

4.  2-Deoxy-D-glucose, but not mercaptoacetate, increases food intake in decerebrate rats.

Authors:  Rebecca A Darling; Sue Ritter
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Ghrelin and Orexin Interact to Increase Meal Size Through a Descending Hippocampus to Hindbrain Signaling Pathway.

Authors:  Andrea N Suarez; Clarissa M Liu; Alyssa M Cortella; Emily E Noble; Scott E Kanoski
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 6.  Neuroendocrine regulation of appetitive ingestive behavior.

Authors:  Erin Keen-Rhinehart; Katelynn Ondek; Jill E Schneider
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-15       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.