Literature DB >> 16218173

A randomized trial to evaluate lopinavir/ritonavir versus saquinavir/ritonavir in HIV-1-infected patients: the MaxCmin2 trial.

Ulrik B Dragsted1, Jan Gerstoft, Mike Youle, Zoe Fox, Marcello Losso, Jorge Benetucci, Dushyantha T Jayaweera, Armin Rieger, Johan N Bruun, Antonella Castagna, Brian Gazzard, Sharon Walmsley, Andrew Hill, Jens D Lundgren.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the rate of protocol-defined treatment failure and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) and saquinavir/ritonavir (SAQ/r).
DESIGN: Open-label, prospective, randomized (1:1), international multi-centre trial.
METHODS: Adult HIV-1-infected patients were assigned LPV/r 400/100 mg twice daily or SAQ/r 1000/100 mg twice daily with two or more nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs)/non-NRTIs. All patients, whether on or off the assigned treatment, were followed for 48 weeks.
RESULTS: Of 339 randomized patients, 324 initiated assigned treatment (intention-to-treat/exposed [ITT/e] population). At 48 weeks, treatment failure occurred in 29/163 (18%) and 53/161 (33%) of patients in the LPV/r and SAQ/r arms, respectively (ITT/e, P = 0.002, log rank test). In an analysis that also considered those patients who discontinued treatment as having failed treatment (ITT/e/discontinuation = failure), 40/161 (25%) LPV/r-treated individuals versus 63/161 (39%) SAQ/R-treated individuals failed treatment (P = 0.005, log rank test). Discontinuation of the assigned treatment occurred in 23/163 (14%) patients in the LPV/r-treated group, compared with 48/161 (300%) in the SAQ/r-treated group (ITT/e; P = 0.001). The primary reasons for premature discontinuation were non-fatal adverse events (LPV/r: 12/163; SAQ/r: 21/161) and patients' choice (LPV/r: 7/163; SAQ/r: 8/161). In the on-treatment analysis of time to treatment failure, no difference was observed between the two arms (P = 0.27, log rank test).
CONCLUSION: LPV/r had better antiretroviral effects compared with SAQ/r at the doses and in the formulations studied. This may have been a result of patients' preferences and ability to adhere to assigned therapy, rather than a result of differences in the intrinsic potency of the study protease inhibitors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16218173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antivir Ther        ISSN: 1359-6535


  21 in total

1.  Antiretroviral therapy for adults infected with HIV: Guidelines for health care professionals from the Quebec HIV care committee.

Authors:  Danielle Rouleau; Claude Fortin; Benoît Trottier; Richard Lalonde; Normand Lapointe; Pierre Côté; Jean-Pierre Routy; Marie-France Matte; Irina Tsarevsky; Jean-Guy Baril
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Instantaneous inhibitory potential is similar to inhibitory quotient at predicting HIV-1 response to antiretroviral therapy.

Authors:  Timothy J Henrich; Heather J Ribaudo; Daniel R Kuritzkes
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 9.079

3.  US cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in treatment-experienced, HIV-infected adults with evidence of protease inhibitor resistance included in the TITAN Trial.

Authors:  Anita Brogan; Josephine Mauskopf; Sandra E Talbird; Erik Smets
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 4.  Clinical management of treatment-experienced, HIV/AIDS patients in the combination antiretroviral therapy era.

Authors:  Mark A Boyd; Andrew M Hill
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Cost effectiveness of darunavir/ritonavir 600/100 mg bid in treatment-experienced, lopinavir-naive, protease inhibitor-resistant, HIV-infected adults in Belgium, Italy, Sweden and the UK.

Authors:  Karen Moeremans; Lindsay Hemmett; Jonas Hjelmgren; Gabriele Allegri; Erik Smets
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Safety and efficacy of a saquinavir-containing antiretroviral regimen in previously ART-naïve or pretreated but protease inhibitor-naïve HIV-positive patients.

Authors:  H Knechten; C Stephan; F A Mosthaf; H Jaeger; T Lutz; A Cargnico; A Stoehr; S Koeppe; C Mayr; K Schewe; E Wolf; E Wellmann; A Tappe
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Protease Inhibitors for Patients With HIV-1 Infection: A Comparative Overview.

Authors:  Peter J Hughes; Erika Cretton-Scott; Ami Teague; Terri M Wensel
Journal:  P T       Date:  2011-06

8.  Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetic of once-daily boosted saquinavir (1500/100 mg) together with 2 nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors in real life: a multicentre prospective study.

Authors:  Luis F López-Cortés; Pompeyo Viciana; Rosa Ruiz-Valderas; Juan Pasquau; Josefa Ruiz; Fernando Lozano; Dolores Merino; Antonio Vergara; Alberto Terrón; Luis González; Antonio Rivero; Agustin Muñoz-Sanz
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 2.250

9.  Safety and Efficacy in HIV-1-Infected Patients Treated with Ritonavir-Boosted Saquinavir Mesylate.

Authors:  Heribert Knechten; Thomas Lutz; Piotr Pulik; Teodoro Martin; Andre Tappe; Hans Jaeger
Journal:  Arch Drug Inf       Date:  2010-03

10.  Lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of HIV-1 infection: a review.

Authors:  Ashish Chandwani; Jonathan Shuter
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.423

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.