PURPOSE: We studied the effects of biofeedback treatment on voiding and urodynamic parameters in children with voiding dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 188 children between June 1998 and November 2003. Biofeedback was performed with a urodynamics processor that enables simultaneous recording of urine flow and electromyography, and visual display of flow/electromyography activity. At the beginning of the study this treatment was performed once weekly. After patients understood the concept and performed homework regularly sessions were scheduled at 3 to 4-week intervals and continued for 6 months. All children were evaluated at 6 months and again at 2 years after completing biofeedback training. RESULTS: The number of the children completing biofeedback was 168 (89.4%). Improvement was obtained in all parameters, ranging from 59.2% to 87.8% at 6 months. Maximum improvement was acquired with flattened voiding in 65 of 74 children (87.8%), whereas the least improvement was acquired with daytime wetting in 58 of 98 children (59.2%). These improvements continued at 2-year followup, and ranged from 53.1% to 87.3%. While the rate of improvement for nocturnal enuresis, staccato voiding, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infection had increased, the remaining parameters had decreased at 2-year followup. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback training is a simple, effective and well tolerated treatment modality in children for various parameters resulting from bladder dysfunction. Motivation and willingness to participate in biofeedback treatment are important selection criteria.
PURPOSE: We studied the effects of biofeedback treatment on voiding and urodynamic parameters in children with voiding dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively studied 188 children between June 1998 and November 2003. Biofeedback was performed with a urodynamics processor that enables simultaneous recording of urine flow and electromyography, and visual display of flow/electromyography activity. At the beginning of the study this treatment was performed once weekly. After patients understood the concept and performed homework regularly sessions were scheduled at 3 to 4-week intervals and continued for 6 months. All children were evaluated at 6 months and again at 2 years after completing biofeedback training. RESULTS: The number of the children completing biofeedback was 168 (89.4%). Improvement was obtained in all parameters, ranging from 59.2% to 87.8% at 6 months. Maximum improvement was acquired with flattened voiding in 65 of 74 children (87.8%), whereas the least improvement was acquired with daytime wetting in 58 of 98 children (59.2%). These improvements continued at 2-year followup, and ranged from 53.1% to 87.3%. While the rate of improvement for nocturnal enuresis, staccato voiding, detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia, vesicoureteral reflux and urinary tract infection had increased, the remaining parameters had decreased at 2-year followup. CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback training is a simple, effective and well tolerated treatment modality in children for various parameters resulting from bladder dysfunction. Motivation and willingness to participate in biofeedback treatment are important selection criteria.