Literature DB >> 16217367

Report of the national survey of Urology Program Directors: attitudes and actions regarding the accreditation council for graduate medical education regulations.

Byron D Joyner1, Kristy Siedel, Doris Stoll, Michael Mitchell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Residency programs in the United States are held accountable for achieving outcomes based on the new Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) regulations for improving resident fatigue and education. A national survey of Urology Program Directors was conducted to determine the attitudes toward the new regulations and the actions taken to implement them.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A national survey was developed by an ad hoc committee and distributed electronically. A total of 24 multiple-choice customized Likert scale questions were used to obtain opinions from Urology Program Directors across the country. The data were evaluated using statistical analysis.
RESULTS: There was an 88% response rate to the survey. Of the respondents 53% demonstrated a statistically significant association between the size of the program and the degree to which the program was involved in addressing the duty hours standard (p = 0.015). A majority of program directors reported involvement in educating residents and faculty about the ACGME competencies. According to program directors, faculty members were negative about training residents in an 80-hour workweek and residents seemed to be apathetic.
CONCLUSIONS: The national survey of Urology Program Directors has demonstrated that most programs have started to attend to the cultural change occurring in GME. Although there are some pockets of resistance to the ACGME regulations, the duty hours have been folded into most programs with little apprehension. Barriers to implementation of the Core Competencies discovered in this survey included inadequate validated instrumentation, inadequate staffing, and insufficient financial support.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16217367     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000177468.30135.ff

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Teaching and Assessing Colorectal Surgery Residents in the Age of ACGME Competencies: Pieces of the Whole.

Authors:  Jan Rakinic
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2012-09

Review 2.  Barriers to Implementing the ACGME Outcome Project: A Systematic Review of Program Director Surveys.

Authors:  Mohammad U Malik; David A Diaz Voss Varela; Charles M Stewart; Kulsoom Laeeq; Gayane Yenokyan; Howard W Francis; Nasir I Bhatti
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-12

3.  The effects of fatigue on robotic surgical skill training in Urology residents.

Authors:  James R Mark; Douglas C Kelly; Edouard J Trabulsi; Patrick J Shenot; Costas D Lallas
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-05-14

4.  Results from a transitional-year program director survey: identifying crucial issues and concerns.

Authors:  Steven R Craig; Hayden L Smith; Matthew W Short
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2012-03

5.  Anticipated consequences of the 2011 duty hours standards: views of internal medicine and surgery program directors.

Authors:  Judy A Shea; Lisa L Willett; Karen R Borman; Kamal M F Itani; Furman S McDonald; Stephanie A Call; Saima Chaudhry; Michael Adams; Karen M Chacko; Kevin G Volpp; Vineet M Arora
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 6.  Organizational interventions in response to duty hour reforms.

Authors:  Madelyn P Law; Elaina Orlando; G Ross Baker
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 2.463

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.