PURPOSE: Mismatch repair genes are responsible for the coordinated correction of misincorporated nucleotides formed during DNA replication. Mismatch repair expression is altered in a subset of prostate cancers (PCs) and a recent study suggested that time to biochemical recurrence following prostatectomy correlated with the degree of hMSH2 immunohistochemical staining. We compared hMSH2 expression and survival in clinically organ confined PC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prostate tissue microarray was constructed using 243 specimens from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection for clinically organ confined PC with up to 12 years of followup. Immunohistochemistry was performed with anti-human MSH2 monoclonal antibody. Three independent observers evaluated hMSH2 expression on a scale of 0 to 4. Low expression was defined as a score of less than 2 and high expression was defined as a score of 2 or higher. Statistical analysis used the Fisher exact test, and Goodman and Kruskal gamma coefficient. RESULTS: Higher Gleason score significantly correlated with higher hMSH2 expression (p < 0.0002). Low hMSH2 expression correlated with increased overall, disease-free and biochemical disease-free survival (all p < 0.01). Analysis comparing low vs high hMSH2 expression was significant with respect to overall (p = 0.0004), disease-free (p = 0.005) and biochemical disease-free (p = 0.0177) survival. CONCLUSIONS: hMSH2 is differentially expressed in malignant prostate tissue and hMSH2 immunohistochemical staining intensity correlates with Gleason score, overall and disease-free survival. Taken together our results suggest that hMSH2 expression may be a useful prognostic biomarker for outcome in men with clinically organ confined PC.
PURPOSE: Mismatch repair genes are responsible for the coordinated correction of misincorporated nucleotides formed during DNA replication. Mismatch repair expression is altered in a subset of prostate cancers (PCs) and a recent study suggested that time to biochemical recurrence following prostatectomy correlated with the degree of hMSH2 immunohistochemical staining. We compared hMSH2 expression and survival in clinically organ confined PC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prostate tissue microarray was constructed using 243 specimens from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy with extended lymph node dissection for clinically organ confined PC with up to 12 years of followup. Immunohistochemistry was performed with anti-humanMSH2 monoclonal antibody. Three independent observers evaluated hMSH2 expression on a scale of 0 to 4. Low expression was defined as a score of less than 2 and high expression was defined as a score of 2 or higher. Statistical analysis used the Fisher exact test, and Goodman and Kruskal gamma coefficient. RESULTS: Higher Gleason score significantly correlated with higher hMSH2 expression (p < 0.0002). Low hMSH2 expression correlated with increased overall, disease-free and biochemical disease-free survival (all p < 0.01). Analysis comparing low vs high hMSH2 expression was significant with respect to overall (p = 0.0004), disease-free (p = 0.005) and biochemical disease-free (p = 0.0177) survival. CONCLUSIONS:hMSH2 is differentially expressed in malignant prostate tissue and hMSH2 immunohistochemical staining intensity correlates with Gleason score, overall and disease-free survival. Taken together our results suggest that hMSH2 expression may be a useful prognostic biomarker for outcome in men with clinically organ confined PC.
Authors: Francisco C Pérez-Martínez; Verónica Alonso; José L Sarasa; Syon-Ghyun Nam-Cha; Remigio Vela-Navarrete; Félix Manzarbeitia; Francisco J Calahorra; Pedro Esbrit Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2006-06-14 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Maximilian Burger; Stefan Denzinger; Christine G Hammerschmied; Andrea Tannapfel; Ellen C Obermann; Wolf F Wieland; Arndt Hartmann; Robert Stoehr Journal: J Mol Med (Berl) Date: 2006-08-03 Impact factor: 4.599
Authors: Silvan Boxler; Valentin Djonov; Thomas M Kessler; Ruslan Hlushchuk; Lucas M Bachmann; Ulrike Held; Regula Markwalder; George N Thalmann Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2010-10-01 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Wendy J Langeberg; Erika M Kwon; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Elaine A Ostrander; Janet L Stanford Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: E V Morris; L Cerundolo; M Lu; C Verrill; F Fritzsche; M J White; G N Thalmann; C S ten Donkelaar; I Ratnayaka; V Salter; F C Hamdy; X Lu; R J Bryant Journal: Cell Death Dis Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 8.469
Authors: Belinda Nghiem; Xiaotun Zhang; Hung-Ming Lam; Lawrence D True; Ilsa Coleman; Celestia S Higano; Peter S Nelson; Colin C Pritchard; Colm Morrissey Journal: Asian J Urol Date: 2016-09-12