Literature DB >> 16217278

A scoring algorithm to predict survival for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a stratification tool for prospective clinical trials.

Bradley C Leibovich1, John C Cheville, Christine M Lohse, Horst Zincke, Igor Frank, Eugene D Kwon, Jaime R Merchan, Michael L Blute.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We developed a clinically useful scoring algorithm to predict cancer specific survival for patients with clear cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied 727 patients treated with radical nephrectomy for clear cell RCC from 1970 to 2000 who had distant metastases at nephrectomy (285) or in whom metastases subsequently developed (442). A scoring algorithm to predict cancer specific survival was developed using the regression coefficients from a Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: There were 606 deaths from clear cell RCC at a median of 1.0 years (range 0 to 14) following metastatic RCC. Constitutional symptoms at nephrectomy (+2), metastases to the bone (+2) or liver (+4), metastases in multiple simultaneous sites (+2), metastases at nephrectomy (+1) or within 2 years of nephrectomy (+3), complete resection of all metastatic sites (-5), tumor thrombus level I to IV (+3), and the primary pathological features of nuclear grade 4 (+3) and histological tumor necrosis (+2) were significantly associated with death from RCC. All patients started with a score of 0 and points were added or subtracted as indicated in parentheses. Cancer specific survival rates at 1 year were 85.1%, 72.1%, 58.8%, 39.0%, and 25.1%, respectively, for patients with scores of -5 to -1, scores of 0 to 2, scores of 3 to 6, scores of 7 or 8, and scores of 9 or more.
CONCLUSIONS: This scoring algorithm can be used to predict cancer specific survival for patients with metastatic clear cell RCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16217278     DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000177487.64651.3a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  49 in total

1.  Pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma: the state of the art.

Authors:  Roberto Ballarin; Mario Spaggiari; Nicola Cautero; Nicola De Ruvo; Roberto Montalti; Cristina Longo; Anna Pecchi; Patrizia Giacobazzi; Giuseppina De Marco; Giuseppe D'Amico; Giorgio Enrico Gerunda; Fabrizio Di Benedetto
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  [Systemic and surgical management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  M W Kramer; A S Merseburger; I Peters; S Waalkes; M A Kuczyk
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years?

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Shahrokh Shariat; Wilhelm Huebner; Harun Fajkovic; Christian Seitz
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2011-04

Review 4.  Is there a role for systemic targeted therapy after surgical treatment for metastases of renal cell carcinoma?

Authors:  Adrian Husillos Alonso; Manuel Carbonero García; Carmen González Enguita
Journal:  World J Nephrol       Date:  2015-05-06

5.  Imaging techniques as predictive and prognostic biomarkers in renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Paul Nathan; Anup Vinayan
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 8.168

6.  Surgical management of renal cell carcinoma: Canadian Kidney Cancer Forum Consensus.

Authors:  Ricardo A Rendon; Anil Kapoor; Rodney Breau; Michael Leveridge; Andrew Feifer; Peter C Black; Alan So
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  The difficulty in selecting patients for cytoreductive nephrectomy: An evaluation of previously described predictive models.

Authors:  Brandon J Manley; Daniel M Tennenbaum; Emily A Vertosick; James J Hsieh; Daniel D Sjoberg; Melissa Assel; Nicole E Benfante; Seth A Strope; Eric Kim; Jozefina Casuscelli; Maria F Becerra; Jonathan A Coleman; Abraham Ari Hakimi; Paul Russo
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 8.  Reporting methods in studies developing prognostic models in cancer: a review.

Authors:  Susan Mallett; Patrick Royston; Susan Dutton; Rachel Waters; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 9.  Reporting performance of prognostic models in cancer: a review.

Authors:  Susan Mallett; Patrick Royston; Rachel Waters; Susan Dutton; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  C-reactive Protein in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Carcinoma: An Important Biomarker for Tumor-associated Inflammation.

Authors:  Albrecht Reichle; Jochen Grassinger; Klaus Bross; Jochen Wilke; Thomas Suedhoff; Bernhard Walter; Wolf-Ferdinand Wieland; Anna Berand; Reinhard Andreesen
Journal:  Biomark Insights       Date:  2007-02-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.