Literature DB >> 16217197

Radiation protectants: current status and future prospects.

Thomas M Seed1.   

Abstract

In today's heightened nuclear/biological/chemical threat environment, there is an increased need to have safe and effective means to protect not only special high-risk service groups, but also the general population at large, from the health hazards of unintended ionizing radiation exposures. An unfulfilled dream has been to have a globally effective pharmacologic that could be easily taken orally without any undue side effects prior to a suspected or impending nuclear/radiological event; such an ideal radioprotective agent has yet to be identified, let alone fully developed and approved for human use. No one would argue against the fact that this is problematic and needs to be corrected, but where might the ultimate solution to this difficult problem be found? Without question, representative species of the aminothiol family [e.g., Amifostine (MedImmune, Gaithersburg, Maryland)] have proven to be potent cytoprotectants for normal tissues subjected to irradiation or to radiomimetic chemicals. Although Amifostine is currently used clinically, drug toxicity, limited times of protection, and unfavorable routes of administration, all serve to limit the drug's utility in nonclinical settings. A full range of research and development strategies is being employed currently in the hunt for new safe and effective radioprotectants. These include: (1) large scale screening of new chemical classes or natural products; (2) restructuring/reformulating older protectants with proven efficacies but unwanted toxicities; (3) using nutraceuticals that are only moderately protective but are essentially nontoxic; (4) using low dose combinations of potentially toxic but efficacious agents that protect through different routes to foster radioprotective synergy; and (5) accepting a lower level of drug efficacy in lieu of reduced toxicity, banking on the premise that the protection afforded can be leveraged by post-exposure therapies. Although it is difficult to predict which of these strategies will ultimately prove to be successful, it is certain that the probability of a useful protectant being fielded is increased significantly. This is due to the resurgence of interest in radiation protection, increased resources being expended by federal agencies, and by the Food and Drug Administration's willingness to innovate relative to new approval guidance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16217197     DOI: 10.1097/01.hp.0000175153.19745.25

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  26 in total

Review 1.  Modifying radiation damage.

Authors:  Kwanghee Kim; William H McBride
Journal:  Curr Drug Targets       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.465

2.  Cubilin and megalin in radiation-induced renal injury with labelled somatostatin analogues: are we just dealing with the kidney?

Authors:  Edgar J Rolleman; Roelf Valkema; Marleen Melis; Marion de Jong; Eric P Krenning; Theo J Visser; Edgar J Rolleman
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Potent radioprotective effects of combined regimens of famotidine and vitamin C against radiation-induced micronuclei in mouse bone marrow erythrocytes.

Authors:  M Zangeneh; H Mozdarani; A Mahmoudzadeh
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Radioprotection to small intestine of the mice against ionizing radiation by semiquinone glucoside derivative (SQGD) isolated from Bacillus sp. INM-1.

Authors:  Dev Dutt Patel; Deen Dayal Bansal; Saurabh Mishra; Rajesh Arora; Ashok Sharma; Swatantra Kumar Jain; Raj Kumar
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 3.396

Review 5.  Pharmacological management of ionizing radiation injuries: current and prospective agents and targeted organ systems.

Authors:  Vijay K Singh; Thomas M Seed
Journal:  Expert Opin Pharmacother       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 3.889

6.  A Metabolomic Serum Signature from Nonhuman Primates Treated with a Radiation Countermeasure, Gamma-tocotrienol, and Exposed to Ionizing Radiation.

Authors:  Evan L Pannkuk; Evagelia C Laiakis; Albert J Fornace; Oluseyi O Fatanmi; Vijay K Singh
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.316

7.  Radioprotection by the histone deacetylase inhibitor phenylbutyrate.

Authors:  Alexandra C Miller; Stuart Cohen; Michael Stewart; Rafael Rivas; Paul Lison
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-09-03       Impact factor: 1.925

8.  High-throughput screening identifies two classes of antibiotics as radioprotectors: tetracyclines and fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  Kwanghee Kim; Julianne M Pollard; Andrew J Norris; J Tyson McDonald; Yingli Sun; Ewa Micewicz; Kelly Pettijohn; Robert Damoiseaux; Keisuke S Iwamoto; James W Sayre; Brendan D Price; Richard A Gatti; William H McBride
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  Genistein protects against biomarkers of delayed lung sequelae in mice surviving high-dose total body irradiation.

Authors:  Regina M Day; Michal Barshishat-Kupper; Steven R Mog; Elizabeth A McCart; P G S Prasanna; Thomas A Davis; Michael R Landauer
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2008-04-23       Impact factor: 2.724

10.  Protection effect of cerium oxide nanoparticles against radiation-induced acute lung injuries in rats.

Authors:  Fatemeh Kadivar; Gholamhassan Haddadi; Mohammad Amin Mosleh-Shirazi; Fatemeh Khajeh; Alireza Tavasoli
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.