Literature DB >> 16217189

Radiological threat assessment and the Federal Response Plan--a gap analysis.

W Craig Conklin1, Philip L Liotta.   

Abstract

The ability of the federal government to effectively and efficiently respond to nuclear or radiological terrorist attacks has been the subject of intense discussion and analysis for many years. Because of recent terrorist activities and intelligence information, there is strong sentiment that it is not a question of if, but when, a radiological or nuclear terrorist attack will occur. As a result, there is considerable concern that the federal government may not be adequately prepared to respond to an attack involving a radiological dispersal device or improvised nuclear device. In response to these concerns, federal departments and agencies have initiated actions to develop a better understanding of the magnitude of the radiological/nuclear terrorist threat, assess the ability of the federal government to support state and local responses to such attacks, and improve the Nation's ability to prepare for, respond to, and recover from these types of attacks. In an era of limited fiscal growth and competing priorities, the federal government will have to enhance its collaboration with state and local governments, the private sector, and academia to ensure that the Nation is capable of responding to a terrorist attack involving radioactive or nuclear material.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16217189     DOI: 10.1097/01.hp.0000178546.37526.c8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Phys        ISSN: 0017-9078            Impact factor:   1.316


  6 in total

1.  How Do Low-Literacy Populations Perceive "Dirty Bombs"? Implications for Preparedness Messages.

Authors:  Sarah Bauerle Bass; Thomas F Gordon; Laurie Maurer; Judith Greener; Gabriella Mora; Dominique Ruggieri; Caitlin Wolak; Claudia Parvanta
Journal:  Health Secur       Date:  2016-09-01

2.  Attitudes and perceptions of urban African Americans of a "dirty bomb" radiological terror event: results of a qualitative study and implications for effective risk communication.

Authors:  Sarah Bauerle Bass; Judith R Greener; Dominique Ruggieri; Claudia Parvanta; Gabriella Mora; Caitlin Wolak; Rebecca Normile; Thomas F Gordon
Journal:  Disaster Med Public Health Prep       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 1.385

Review 3.  Nuclear and Radiological Emergencies: Biological Effects, Countermeasures and Biodosimetry.

Authors:  Elena Obrador; Rosario Salvador-Palmer; Juan I Villaescusa; Eduardo Gallego; Blanca Pellicer; José M Estrela; Alegría Montoro
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

4.  The use of gamma-H2AX as a biodosimeter for total-body radiation exposure in non-human primates.

Authors:  Christophe E Redon; Asako J Nakamura; Ksenia Gouliaeva; Arifur Rahman; William F Blakely; William M Bonner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  The role of mass spectrometry-based metabolomics in medical countermeasures against radiation.

Authors:  Andrew D Patterson; Christian Lanz; Frank J Gonzalez; Jeffrey R Idle
Journal:  Mass Spectrom Rev       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 10.946

6.  Positive Cofactor 4 as a Potential Radiation Biodosimeter for Early Assessment.

Authors:  Le Ma; Qiang Gong; Gaoyu Liu; Jieping Chen; Yu Wang; Peng Luo; Chunmeng Shi
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.658

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.