Literature DB >> 16217154

Skin care protocols for pressure ulcers and incontinence in long-term care: a quasi-experimental study.

Patricia Thompson1, Diane Langemo, Julie Anderson, Darlene Hanson, Susan Hunter.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on pressure ulcer prevalence, incidence, and healing time of incorporating use of a specific body wash and a skin protectant into skin care protocols that are based on guidelines from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.
DESIGN: Quasi-experimental intervention study.
SETTING: 2 rural long-term-care facilities. PARTICIPANTS: A convenience sample of 136 residents at 2 rural long-term-care facilities during a 3-month preintervention and a 3-month postintervention period.
INTERVENTIONS: A 3-month preintervention observation period (baseline) was followed by a staff in-service session, in which the use of a body wash and a skin protectant was introduced into skin care protocols, and a 3-month postintervention observation period. The skin care protocols included skin assessment techniques, prevention and treatment strategies for Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers, and management of incontinence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in the occurrence and healing time of Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers before and after introduction of use of a body wash and a skin protectant into skin care protocols and the occurrence rate of urinary and fecal incontinence.
RESULTS: Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers significantly decreased from 35 preintervention to 14 postintervention (t = 19.48, df = 47, P = .05). The prevalence of pressure ulcers preintervention was 11.3%, compared with 4.8% postintervention (t = 2.47, df = 1.0, P = .24), The change in the incidence of pressure ulcers was significant (t = 8.48, df = -2.0, P = .01), with 32.7% preintervention and 8.9% postintervention. Healing time for pressure ulcers ranged from 4 to 70 days preintervention (mean [M] = 22.72 +/- 18.25) to 6 to 49 days postintervention (M = 16.0 +/- 12.93). The decrease in pressure ulcer healing time (rapid, medium, and long) preintervention to postintervention was statistically significant (chi 2= 14.9, P = .001). The presence of fecal and urinary incontinence was significantly associated with the development of Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers (chi2= 44.8, P = .000).
CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of skin care protocols that included use of a body wash and a skin protectant reduced the incidence of Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers and decreased healing time. The skin protectant and body wash used in the protocols were found to be effective in preventing and treating Stage I and Stage II pressure ulcers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16217154     DOI: 10.1097/00129334-200510000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care        ISSN: 1527-7941            Impact factor:   2.347


  7 in total

1.  Pressure ulcer prevention: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-04-01

2.  Methodological issues in studies of the effectiveness of pressure ulcer prevention interventions.

Authors:  Mona Baumgarten; Michelle Shardell; Shayna Rich
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.347

Review 3.  Recommendations for managing cutaneous disorders associated with advancing age.

Authors:  Philippe Humbert; Brigitte Dréno; Jean Krutmann; Thomas Anton Luger; Raoul Triller; Sylvie Meaume; Sophie Seité
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Study protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of a comprehensive pressure ulcer prevention programme for private for-profit nursing homes.

Authors:  Enid Wai-yung Kwong; Paul Hong Lee; Kwan-mo Yeung
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2016-01-18       Impact factor: 3.921

5.  Cinnamaldehyde-Based Self-Nanoemulsion (CA-SNEDDS) Accelerates Wound Healing and Exerts Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Effects in Rats' Skin Burn Model.

Authors:  Kamal A Qureshi; Salman A A Mohammed; Omar Khan; Hussein M Ali; Mahmoud Z El-Readi; Hamdoon A Mohammed
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 4.927

Review 6.  Wound care in the geriatric client.

Authors:  Steve Gist; Iris Tio-Matos; Sharon Falzgraf; Shirley Cameron; Michael Beebe
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 4.458

7.  Effect of Varying Repositioning Frequency on Pressure Injury Prevention in Nursing Home Residents: TEAM-UP Trial Results.

Authors:  Tracey L Yap; Susan D Horn; Phoebe D Sharkey; Tianyu Zheng; Nancy Bergstrom; Cathleen Colon-Emeric; Valerie K Sabol; Jenny Alderden; Winston Yap; Susan M Kennerly
Journal:  Adv Skin Wound Care       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 2.373

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.