BACKGROUND: Despite regular health care, preventive health issues may be neglected in patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes. Case-control studies in the United States have shown lower mammogram rates in women with diabetes; however, it is not known whether the presence of diabetes mellitus affects mammography use in a Canadian setting, where there is universal access to health care. METHODS: Using health databases in Ontario from April 1, 1999, to March 31, 2002, this retrospective cohort study observed women aged 50 to 67 years, who were free of breast cancer, until their first mammogram in a 2-year period. Mammogram rates were compared between women who had had diabetes for a minimum of 2 years (n = 69 168) and women without diabetes (n = 663 519). RESULTS: Compared with women without diabetes, diabetic patients were older, had more physician visits, were more often from a lower-income neighborhood, and, in those 65 years or older, were less likely to be taking estrogen. The odds ratio of having a mammogram during the 2-year period was 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.70; P<.001) for women with diabetes, and adjustment for age and other covariates did not modify this effect. CONCLUSIONS: Women with diabetes were significantly less likely to have had a mammogram during a 2-year period than were women without diabetes, despite more health care visits. These results suggest that, because of the complexity involved in diabetes care, routine preventive care such as cancer screening is often neglected. These findings highlight the need for better organization of primary care for patients with chronic diseases.
BACKGROUND: Despite regular health care, preventive health issues may be neglected in patients with chronic diseases such as diabetes. Case-control studies in the United States have shown lower mammogram rates in women with diabetes; however, it is not known whether the presence of diabetes mellitus affects mammography use in a Canadian setting, where there is universal access to health care. METHODS: Using health databases in Ontario from April 1, 1999, to March 31, 2002, this retrospective cohort study observed women aged 50 to 67 years, who were free of breast cancer, until their first mammogram in a 2-year period. Mammogram rates were compared between women who had had diabetes for a minimum of 2 years (n = 69 168) and women without diabetes (n = 663 519). RESULTS: Compared with women without diabetes, diabeticpatients were older, had more physician visits, were more often from a lower-income neighborhood, and, in those 65 years or older, were less likely to be taking estrogen. The odds ratio of having a mammogram during the 2-year period was 0.68 (95% confidence interval, 0.67-0.70; P<.001) for women with diabetes, and adjustment for age and other covariates did not modify this effect. CONCLUSIONS:Women with diabetes were significantly less likely to have had a mammogram during a 2-year period than were women without diabetes, despite more health care visits. These results suggest that, because of the complexity involved in diabetes care, routine preventive care such as cancer screening is often neglected. These findings highlight the need for better organization of primary care for patients with chronic diseases.
Authors: Juhua Luo; Beth Virnig; Michael Hendryx; Sijin Wen; Rowan Chelebowski; Chu Chen; Tomas Rohan; Lesley Tinker; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Lawrence Lessin; Karen Margolis Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2014-09-27 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Gregory S Calip; Onchee Yu; Denise M Boudreau; Huibo Shao; Ruth Oratz; Stephen B Richardson; Heather T Gold Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Maureen Sanderson; Gerson Peltz; Adriana Perez; Matthew Johnson; Sally W Vernon; Maria E Fernandez; Mary K Fadden Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 2.984
Authors: Maureen Sanderson; Jay H Fowke; Loren Lipworth; Xijing Han; Flora Ukoli; Ann L Coker; William J Blot; Margaret K Hargreaves Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 2.506