L Wei1, M J Murphy, T M MacDonald. 1. Health Informatics Centre, Division of Community Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact on cardiovascular events of changes in high density lipoprotein (HDL) adjusted for changes in total cholesterol. DESIGN: Cohort study based on a record linkage database. SETTING: Community study in Tayside, Scotland, UK. PATIENTS: 18,815 patients were identified for the study between 1989 and 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiovascular events. RESULTS: 5510 patients taking lipid lowering treatment who had not been hospitalised previously for cardiovascular disease had 314 cardiovascular events recorded (9407 person years of follow up). Patients whose HDL rose by > 20% were less likely to have an event (23.5/1000 person years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 17.3 to 29.6) compared with patients whose HDL did not rise (42.6/1000 person years, 95% CI 35.5 to 49.7, adjusted relative risk 0.60, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.83). HDL change and cardiovascular outcome were not significantly associated among patients who had been hospitalised previously for cardiovascular disease or among patients who were not taking lipid lowering drugs. CONCLUSION: In this study a rise in HDL independently predicted reduced cardiovascular risk in patients taking lipid lowering treatment who had not been hospitalised previously for cardiovascular disease.
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact on cardiovascular events of changes in high density lipoprotein (HDL) adjusted for changes in total cholesterol. DESIGN: Cohort study based on a record linkage database. SETTING: Community study in Tayside, Scotland, UK. PATIENTS: 18,815 patients were identified for the study between 1989 and 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiovascular events. RESULTS: 5510 patients taking lipid lowering treatment who had not been hospitalised previously for cardiovascular disease had 314 cardiovascular events recorded (9407 person years of follow up). Patients whose HDL rose by > 20% were less likely to have an event (23.5/1000 person years, 95% confidence interval (CI) 17.3 to 29.6) compared with patients whose HDL did not rise (42.6/1000 person years, 95% CI 35.5 to 49.7, adjusted relative risk 0.60, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.83). HDL change and cardiovascular outcome were not significantly associated among patients who had been hospitalised previously for cardiovascular disease or among patients who were not taking lipid lowering drugs. CONCLUSION: In this study a rise in HDL independently predicted reduced cardiovascular risk in patients taking lipid lowering treatment who had not been hospitalised previously for cardiovascular disease.
Authors: H B Rubins; S J Robins; D Collins; C L Fye; J W Anderson; M B Elam; F H Faas; E Linares; E J Schaefer; G Schectman; T J Wilt; J Wittes Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-08-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John C LaRosa; Scott M Grundy; David D Waters; Charles Shear; Philip Barter; Jean-Charles Fruchart; Antonio M Gotto; Heiner Greten; John J P Kastelein; James Shepherd; Nanette K Wenger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-03-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R B Goldberg; M J Mellies; F M Sacks; L A Moyé; B V Howard; W J Howard; B R Davis; T G Cole; M A Pfeffer; E Braunwald Journal: Circulation Date: 1998-12-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: W S A Smellie; J Forth; S R S Smart; M J Galloway; W Irving; D Bareford; P O Collinson; K G Kerr; G Summerfield; P J Carey; Rubin Minhas Journal: J Clin Pathol Date: 2006-10-17 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Zahi A Fayad; Venkatesh Mani; Mark Woodward; David Kallend; Markus Abt; Tracy Burgess; Valentin Fuster; Christie M Ballantyne; Evan A Stein; Jean-Claude Tardif; James H F Rudd; Michael E Farkouh; Ahmed Tawakol Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 79.321