BACKGROUND: Research concerning the psychometric properties of the WHO Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL-100) in general populations of psychiatric outpatients has not been performed systematically. AIMS: To examine the content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-100 in a general population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients. METHOD: A total of 533 psychiatric outpatients entered the study (438 randomly selected, 85 internally referred). Participants completed self-administered questionnaires for measuring quality of life (WHOQOL-100), psychopathological symptoms (SCL-90), and perceived social support (PSSS). In addition, they underwent two semi-structured interviews in order to obtain Axis-I and Axis-II diagnoses, according to DSM-IV. RESULTS: The drop-out percentage was low (7.1%). Of the 24 facets of the WHOQOL-100, 22 had a good distribution of scores, leaving out the facets physical environment and transport. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure, which was similar to earlier findings in patients with specific somatic diseases and depressive disorders. Various-a priori expected-positive and negative correlations were found between facets and domains of the WHOQOL-100, and dimensions of the SCL-90 and the PSSS-score, indicating good construct validity of the WHOQOL-100. The internal consistency of all facets and the four domains of the WHOQOL-100 was good (Cronbach's alpha's ranging from 0.62 to 0.93 and 0.64 to 0.84, respectively). Sparse and relatively low correlations were found between demographic characteristics (age and sex) and WHOQOL-100 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-100 in a population of adult Dutch psychiatric outpatients are good. The WHOQOL-100 appears to be a suitable instrument for measuring quality of life in adult psychiatric outpatients.
BACKGROUND: Research concerning the psychometric properties of the WHO Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL-100) in general populations of psychiatric outpatients has not been performed systematically. AIMS: To examine the content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-100 in a general population of Dutch adult psychiatric outpatients. METHOD: A total of 533 psychiatric outpatients entered the study (438 randomly selected, 85 internally referred). Participants completed self-administered questionnaires for measuring quality of life (WHOQOL-100), psychopathological symptoms (SCL-90), and perceived social support (PSSS). In addition, they underwent two semi-structured interviews in order to obtain Axis-I and Axis-II diagnoses, according to DSM-IV. RESULTS: The drop-out percentage was low (7.1%). Of the 24 facets of the WHOQOL-100, 22 had a good distribution of scores, leaving out the facets physical environment and transport. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a four-factor structure, which was similar to earlier findings in patients with specific somatic diseases and depressive disorders. Various-a priori expected-positive and negative correlations were found between facets and domains of the WHOQOL-100, and dimensions of the SCL-90 and the PSSS-score, indicating good construct validity of the WHOQOL-100. The internal consistency of all facets and the four domains of the WHOQOL-100 was good (Cronbach's alpha's ranging from 0.62 to 0.93 and 0.64 to 0.84, respectively). Sparse and relatively low correlations were found between demographic characteristics (age and sex) and WHOQOL-100 scores. CONCLUSIONS: Content validity, construct validity, and reliability of the WHOQOL-100 in a population of adult Dutch psychiatric outpatients are good. The WHOQOL-100 appears to be a suitable instrument for measuring quality of life in adult psychiatric outpatients.
Authors: Daniel B Morris; Keith G Wilson; Jennifer J Clinch; Darcy J Ammerman; Dean Fergusson; Ian D Graham; Amy J Porath; Alia Offman; Isabelle Boland; James Watters; Paul C Hébert Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Erik D Masthoff; Fons J Trompenaars; Guus L Van Heck; Helen J Michielsen; Paul P Hodiamont; Jolanda De Vries Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2006-11-08 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Melissa J Rowthorn; D Rex Billington; Christian U Krägeloh; Jason Landon; Oleg N Medvedev Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2019-08-10 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Guilherme C Gracitelli; Vinícius Y Moraes; Carlos Es Franciozi; Marcus V Luzo; João Carlos Belloti Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-09-03
Authors: Joost C Peerbooms; Wilbert van Laar; Frank Faber; Hans M Schuller; Henk van der Hoeven; Taco Gosens Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2010-04-14 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Maria Ginieri-Coccossis; Eugenia Triantafillou; Vlasis Tomaras; Ioannis A Liappas; George N Christodoulou; George N Papadimitriou Journal: Ann Gen Psychiatry Date: 2009-10-13 Impact factor: 3.455