PURPOSE: To report a meta-analysis of results from endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of inflammatory aortic aneurysms (IAA). METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify all studies reporting the results of EVAR in patients with IAA. To be included in the analysis, an article had to provide a minimum follow-up of 6 months, information about primary technical success, details of immediate and long-term complications, and evaluation of at least one of the basic outcome criteria: changes in aneurysm sac diameter, periaortic fibrosis (PAF), and/ or renal impairment. All studies were reviewed by 2 independent observers for the inclusion criteria. Data were retrieved on the technical and clinical success, outcome criteria, mortality in follow-up, and reinterventions from 14 articles selected from among 701 initially identified. RESULTS: The 14 articles encompassed 46 patients (45 men [97.8%]; mean age 65 years, range 59-75) with a mean follow-up of 18 months after endovascular repair of IAAs located in the abdominal aorta. The primary technical success rate was 95.6% (44/46) and the 30-day clinical success rate was 93.4% (43/46). The median aneurysm sac diameter regression was 11 mm. Of 43 patients with PAF prior to the intervention, 22 (51.2%) patients showed complete regression, 18 (41.8%) remained unchanged, and 3 (7.0%) showed progression after EVAR. Renal impairment disappeared in 11 (45.8%) of 24 patients. Reinterventions were reported in 8 patients. The procedure-related and follow-up mortality rates were 0% and 13.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR of IAA is feasible, excludes the aneurysm effectively, and reduces PAF and renal impairment in most patients with very low periprocedural and midterm mortality and an acceptable reintervention rate.
PURPOSE: To report a meta-analysis of results from endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of inflammatory aortic aneurysms (IAA). METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was performed to identify all studies reporting the results of EVAR in patients with IAA. To be included in the analysis, an article had to provide a minimum follow-up of 6 months, information about primary technical success, details of immediate and long-term complications, and evaluation of at least one of the basic outcome criteria: changes in aneurysm sac diameter, periaortic fibrosis (PAF), and/ or renal impairment. All studies were reviewed by 2 independent observers for the inclusion criteria. Data were retrieved on the technical and clinical success, outcome criteria, mortality in follow-up, and reinterventions from 14 articles selected from among 701 initially identified. RESULTS: The 14 articles encompassed 46 patients (45 men [97.8%]; mean age 65 years, range 59-75) with a mean follow-up of 18 months after endovascular repair of IAAs located in the abdominal aorta. The primary technical success rate was 95.6% (44/46) and the 30-day clinical success rate was 93.4% (43/46). The median aneurysm sac diameter regression was 11 mm. Of 43 patients with PAF prior to the intervention, 22 (51.2%) patients showed complete regression, 18 (41.8%) remained unchanged, and 3 (7.0%) showed progression after EVAR. Renal impairment disappeared in 11 (45.8%) of 24 patients. Reinterventions were reported in 8 patients. The procedure-related and follow-up mortality rates were 0% and 13.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EVAR of IAA is feasible, excludes the aneurysm effectively, and reduces PAF and renal impairment in most patients with very low periprocedural and midterm mortality and an acceptable reintervention rate.
Authors: Ludomir Stefańczyk; Marcin Elgalal; Andrzej Papiewski; Wojciech Szubert; Piotr Szopiński Journal: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Date: 2012-09-13 Impact factor: 2.740