Literature DB >> 16215390

Effects of norepinephrine on static and dynamic preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock.

Semir Nouira1, Souheil Elatrous, Saoussen Dimassi, Lamia Besbes, Riadh Boukef, Boussarsar Mohamed, Fekri Abroug.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of norepinephrine on static (right atrial pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure ) and dynamic (pulse pressure variation and arterial systolic pressure variation) preload indicators in experimental hemorrhagic shock.
DESIGN: Prospective controlled experimental study.
SETTING: Animal research laboratory.
SUBJECTS: Six anesthetized and mechanically ventilated dogs.
INTERVENTIONS: Dogs were instrumented for measurement of arterial blood pressure, pulmonary artery catheter derived variables including right atrial pressure, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, and cardiac output. Simultaneously, pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation were calculated. Pulse pressure variation is the difference between the maximal and the minimal value of pulse pressure divided by the mean of the two values and is expressed as a percentage. Systolic pressure variation is the difference between the maximal and the minimal systolic pressure and is expressed as an absolute value. After baseline measurements, hemorrhagic shock was induced by a stepwise cumulative blood withdrawal of 35 mL.kg of body weight. A second set of hemodynamic measurement was made 30 mins after bleeding. The third set was made 30 mins later under norepinephrine.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure and cardiac output decreased after hemorrhage (p < .05), whereas right atrial pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure remained unchanged. Baseline pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation increased significantly with hemorrhage, from 12% (9%) to 28% (11.5%) (p < .001) and from 12.5 (6.5) to 21 (8.2) mm Hg (p < .05), respectively. Norepinephrine induced a significant increase of cardiac output and a significant decrease of pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation but did not significantly change right atrial pressure or pulmonary artery occlusion pressure values. Stroke volume was correlated to pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation but was not correlated to right atrial pressure or pulmonary artery occlusion pressure.
CONCLUSION: Our study confirms the superiority of dynamic variables (pulse pressure variation and systolic pressure variation) over static ones (right atrial pressure and pulmonary artery occlusion pressure) in assessing cardiac preload changes in hemorrhagic shock. However, norepinephrine could significantly reduce the value of these dynamic variables and mask a true intravascular volume deficit possibly by shifting blood from unstressed to stressed volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16215390     DOI: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000182801.48137.13

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  26 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacological optimization of tissue perfusion.

Authors:  N Mongardon; A Dyson; M Singer
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 9.166

2.  Systolic pressure variation and pulse pressure variation during modifications of arterial pressure.

Authors:  Jens C Kubitz; Stefanie Forkl; Thorsten Annecke; Nils Kronas; Alwin E Goetz; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  Perioperative Haemodynamic Optimisation.

Authors:  Hollmann D Aya; Maurizio Cecconi; Andrew Rhodes
Journal:  Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim       Date:  2014-04-01

4.  Fluid sparing and norepinephrine use in a rat model of resuscitated haemorrhagic shock: end-organ impact.

Authors:  Sophie Dunberry-Poissant; Kim Gilbert; Caroline Bouchard; Frédérique Baril; Anne-Marie Cardinal; Sydnée L'Ecuyer; Mathieu Hylands; François Lamontagne; Guy Rousseau; Emmanuel Charbonney
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2018-11-12

5.  Arterial Pressure Variation in Elective Noncardiac Surgery: Identifying Reference Distributions and Modifying Factors.

Authors:  Michael R Mathis; Samuel A Schechtman; Milo C Engoren; Amy M Shanks; Aleda Thompson; Sachin Kheterpal; Kevin K Tremper
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  Can passive leg raising be used to guide fluid administration?

Authors:  Daniel De Backer
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Vasodilation increases pulse pressure variation, mimicking hypovolemic status in rabbits.

Authors:  Glauco A Westphal; Anderson Roman Gonçalves; Antônio Bedin; Raquel Bissacotti Steglich; Eliezer Silva; Luiz Francisco Poli-de-Figueiredo
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.365

8.  The influence of the airway driving pressure on pulsed pressure variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness.

Authors:  Laurent Muller; Guillaume Louart; Philippe-Jean Bousquet; Damien Candela; Lana Zoric; Jean-Emmanuel de La Coussaye; Samir Jaber; Jean-Yves Lefrant
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 9.  [Arterial pressure curve and fluid status].

Authors:  G Pestel; K Fukui
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  The anesthetic effects on vasopressor modulation of cerebral blood flow in an immature swine model.

Authors:  Benjamin Bruins; Todd J Kilbaugh; Susan S Margulies; Stuart H Friess
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 5.108

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.