Literature DB >> 16214883

Diagnostic imaging pathways: development, dissemination, implementation, and evaluation.

Phillip James Bairstow1, Richard Mendelson, Ravinder Dhillon, Frederic Valton.   

Abstract

ISSUE: There are signs of inappropriate application of medical imaging to diagnosis. Inappropriate imaging is a threat to effective diagnosis and effective allocation of resources. The development and deployment of knowledge-based clinical decision support systems is one strategy to reduce inappropriate imaging. DEVELOPMENT OF IMAGING PATHWAYS: A suite of 78 imaging pathways was conceived both as a decision support and educational tool. The pathways were drafted by imaging specialists, but further developed and modified, based on graded evidence and input from requesting clinicians. An electronic environment was developed to contain and deliver the pathways. DISSEMINATION AND IMPLEMENTATION: Imaging pathways were distributed via a hospital local area network and on compact disk. A multifaceted approach was used to raise general awareness of the pathways, followed by intensive 'marketing' activities. Two groups of clinicians were targeted; hospital-based clinicians and general practitioners. EVALUATION: There was increased awareness of imaging pathways. Clinicians judged them to be useful for education and decision support. The method of electronic delivery was adequate. Knowledge of diagnostic imaging and requesting behaviour tended to become more aligned with the pathways. The central objective to reduce inappropriate medical imaging seems to be achievable. LESSONS LEARNED: There is scope to improve the content and the electronic environment, achieve better integration into decision-making processes, and achieve better compliance. A linkage between imaging pathways and electronic requesting could provide alerts to 'non-compliant' requesting. The assignment of a higher cost, or a lower remuneration, to non-authorized and non-compliant imaging would provide tangible incentive to comply, unless there are compelling clinical contraindications.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16214883     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzi078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  4 in total

1.  Unjustified CT examinations in young patients.

Authors:  Heljä Oikarinen; Salme Meriläinen; Eija Pääkkö; Ari Karttunen; Miika T Nieminen; Osmo Tervonen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Factors driving CT utilisation in tertiary hospitals: a decomposition analysis using linked administrative data in Western Australia.

Authors:  Ninh Thi Ha; Susannah Maxwell; Max K Bulsara; Jenny Doust; Donald Mcrobbie; Peter O'Leary; John Slavotinek; Rachael Moorin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Towards Better Test Utilization - Strategies to Improve Physician Ordering and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes.

Authors:  Danielle B Freedman
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2015-01-27

4.  Prevalence of unjustified emergency department x-ray examination referrals performed in a regional Queensland hospital: A pilot study.

Authors:  Marnie Rawle; Alison Pighills
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-07-23
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.