Literature DB >> 16214449

Peripheral CD34+ cells and the risk of in-stent restenosis in patients with coronary heart disease.

Andreas Schober1, Rainer Hoffmann, Nina Oprée, Sandra Knarren, Ekaterina Iofina, Gabriele Hutschenreuter, Peter Hanrath, Christian Weber.   

Abstract

In-stent restenosis represents the major limitation of percutaneous coronary revascularization. The underlying neointimal hyperplasia mainly consists of smooth muscle cells (SMCs), which can be derived from bone marrow cells. We hypothesized that changes in the peripheral progenitor cell counts after coronary stenting may predict the development of restenosis. We prospectively studied men with atherosclerotic coronary artery disease who had undergone successful elective stenting of solitary target lesions (n = 17). Peripheral blood samples were drawn at baseline (before stenting) and 1 day after stenting. The CD34+ cell count was determined by flow cytometry. Follow-up quantitative coronary angiography was performed after 8.1 +/- 2.6 months. Except for longer primary lesions in patients with angiographic restenosis, no significant differences in patient and lesion characteristics were seen. The rate of restenosis (75% vs 11%, p = 0.015) and the extent of diameter stenosis at follow-up (56.9 +/- 26.9% vs 26.5 +/- 16.5%, p = 0.012) were higher in patients with a postprocedural increase in CD34+ cells than in those with a decrease in CD34+ cells. Postprocedural CD34+ cell counts were increased in patients with restenosis but decreased in those without restenosis (p = 0.002). A robust correlation was seen between the change in CD34+ cells and late lumen loss (r = 0.65, p <0.005). In a multivariate regression model, the change in CD34+ cells, lesion length, and preprocedural minimal lumen diameter independently predicted for late lumen loss. In conclusion, an increase in circulating CD34+ cells after coronary stenting constitutes an independent risk factor predicting in-stent restenosis and may be suggestive of their involvement in neointimal hyperplasia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16214449     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.06.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  12 in total

Review 1.  Vascular inflammation and repair: implications for re-endothelialization, restenosis, and stent thrombosis.

Authors:  Teruo Inoue; Kevin Croce; Toshifumi Morooka; Masashi Sakuma; Koichi Node; Daniel I Simon
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 2.  Restenosis after Coronary Stent Implantation: Cellular Mechanisms and Potential of Endothelial Progenitor Cells (A Short Guide for the Interventional Cardiologist).

Authors:  Tommaso Gori
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 7.666

Review 3.  Cardiac repair with adult bone marrow-derived cells: the clinical evidence.

Authors:  Buddhadeb Dawn; Ahmed Abdel-Latif; Santosh K Sanganalmath; Michael P Flaherty; Ewa K Zuba-Surma
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 8.401

4.  Endothelial progenitor cells: what use for the cardiologist?

Authors:  Aurangzeb Siddique; Eduard Shantsila; Gregory Yh Lip; Chetan Varma
Journal:  J Angiogenes Res       Date:  2010-02-22

5.  CD34 affinity pheresis attenuates a surge among circulating progenitor cells following vascular injury.

Authors:  Adriana Harbuzariu; Justine Kim; E Michael Meyer; Albert D Donnenberg; Bryan W Tillman
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 6.  Progenitor cells and vascular disease.

Authors:  M Jevon; A Dorling; P I Hornick
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 6.831

7.  Association between microalbuminuria predicting in-stent restenosis after myocardial infarction and cellular senescence of endothelial progenitor cells.

Authors:  Hisanobu Ota; Naofumi Takehara; Tatsuya Aonuma; Maki Kabara; Motoki Matsuki; Atsushi Yamauchi; Toshiharu Takeuchi; Jun-ichi Kawabe; Naoyuki Hasebe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Percutaneous coronary intervention causes a rapid but transient mobilisation of CD34(+)CD45(-) cells.

Authors:  Gareth J Padfield; Olga Tura-Ceide; Elizabeth Freyer; G Robin Barclay; Marc Turner; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2014-08-20

9.  Endothelial Progenitor Cell Biology and Vascular Recovery Following Transradial Cardiac Catheterization.

Authors:  Andrew Mitchell; Takeshi Fujisawa; Nicholas L Mills; Mairi Brittan; David E Newby; Nicholas L M Cruden
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-10-28       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Smooth muscle progenitor cells: friend or foe in vascular disease?

Authors:  Olivia van Oostrom; Joost O Fledderus; Dominique de Kleijn; Gerard Pasterkamp; Marianne C Verhaar
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.828

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.