Literature DB >> 16213830

Simple determination of human sperm DNA fragmentation with an improved sperm chromatin dispersion test.

José Luis Fernández1, Lourdes Muriel, Vicente Goyanes, Enrique Segrelles, Jaime Gosálvez, María Enciso, Marie LaFromboise, Christopher De Jonge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test and develop it as a simple kit (Halosperm kit) for the accurate determination of sperm DNA fragmentation using conventional bright-field microscopy.
DESIGN: Method development, comparison, and validation.
SETTING: Medical genetics laboratory, academic biology center, and reproductive medicine centers. PATIENT(S): Male infertility patients attending the Reproductive Medicine Center. A varicocele patient and a group of nine fertile subjects. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): [1] The quality of chromatin staining in relaxed sperm nuclear halos and tail preservation; [2] SCD scoring reproducibility; [3] comparison with the sperm chromatin structure assay in 45 samples; [4] frequency of sperm with DNA fragmentation after incubation with increasing doses of the nitric oxide donor sodium nitroprusside and in sperm samples for 9 fertile men, 46 normozoospermic patients, 23 oligoasthenoteratozoospermic patients, and a subject with varicocele. RESULT(S): The sperm nuclei with DNA fragmentation, either spontaneous or induced, do not produce or show very small halos of DNA loop dispersion after sequential incubation in acid and lysis solution. The improved SCD protocol (Halosperm kit) results in better chromatin preservation, therefore highly contrasted halo images can be accurately assessed using conventional bright-field microscopy after Wright staining. Moreover, unlike in the original SCD procedure, the sperm tails are now preserved, making it possible to unequivocally discriminate sperm from other cell types. The chi2 test did not detect significant differences in the mean number of sperm cells with fragmented DNA as scored by four different observers. The intraobserver coefficient of variation for the estimated percentage of spermatozoa with fragmented DNA ranged from 6% to 12%. There was good correlation between the SCD and the sperm chromatin structure assay DNA fragmentation index (intraclass correlation coefficient R: 0.85; percent DNA fragmentation index mean difference: 2.16 significantly higher for SCD). Using the Halosperm kit, a dose-dependent increase in sperm DNA damage after sodium nitroprusside incubation was detected. The percentage of sperm cells with fragmented DNA in the fertile group was 16.3 +/- 6.0, in the normozoospermic group, 27.3 +/- 11.7, and in the oligoasthenoteratozoospermic group, 47.3 +/- 17.3. In the varicocele sample, an extremely high degree of nuclear disruption was detected in the population of sperm cells with fragmented DNA. CONCLUSION(S): The improved SCD test, developed as the Halosperm kit, is a simple, cost effective, rapid, reliable, and accurate procedure, for routinely assessing human sperm DNA fragmentation in the clinical andrology laboratory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16213830     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.11.089

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  84 in total

1.  Value of sperm chromatin dispersion test in couples with unexplained recurrent abortion.

Authors:  Forouzan Absalan; Alireza Ghannadi; Marjaneh Kazerooni; Rostami Parifar; Fatemeh Jamalzadeh; Sahar Amiri
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The ability of sperm selection techniques to remove single- or double-strand DNA damage.

Authors:  María Enciso; Miriam Iglesias; Isabel Galán; Jonás Sarasa; Antonio Gosálvez; Jaime Gosálvez
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 3.  Sperm DNA integrity assays: diagnostic and prognostic challenges and implications in management of infertility.

Authors:  Monis Bilal Shamsi; Syed Nazar Imam; Rima Dada
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Confocal Raman micro-spectroscopy for rapid and label-free detection of maleic acid-induced variations in human sperm.

Authors:  Ning Li; Diling Chen; Yan Xu; Songhao Liu; Heming Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 5.  A translational medicine appraisal of specialized andrology testing in unexplained male infertility.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Rakesh K Sharma; Jaime Gosálvez; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-04-27       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Sperm chromosomal aneuploidy and DNA integrity of infertile men with anejaculation.

Authors:  Yi Qiu; Lei-Guang Wang; Li-Hong Zhang; Juan Li; Ai-Dong Zhang; Mei-Hua Zhang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Effect of iron overload on impaired fertility in male patients with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia.

Authors:  Mei-Jou Chen; Steven Shinn-Forng Peng; Meng-Yao Lu; Yung-Li Yang; Shiann-Tarng Jou; Hsiu-Hao Chang; Shee-Uan Chen; Dong-Tsamn Lin; Kai-Hsin Lin
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 3.756

8.  Double-stranded DNA breaks hidden in the neutral Comet assay suggest a role of the sperm nuclear matrix in DNA integrity maintenance.

Authors:  J Ribas-Maynou; J E Gawecka; J Benet; W S Ward
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 9.  Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes.

Authors:  Ryan T Schulte; Dana A Ohl; Mark Sigman; Gary D Smith
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2009-12-12       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of sperm DNA degradation index (DDSi) as a potential noninvasive biomarker to identify men with varicocele-associated infertility.

Authors:  Sandro C Esteves; Jaime Gosálvez; Carmen López-Fernández; Rocío Núñez-Calonge; Pedro Caballero; Ashok Agarwal; José Luis Fernández
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 2.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.