Literature DB >> 16213799

Discrimination and versatility in mismatch repair.

John B Hays1, Peter D Hoffman, Huixian Wang.   

Abstract

Evolutionarily-conserved mismatch-repair (MMR) systems correct all or almost all base-mismatch errors from DNA replication via excision-resynthesis pathways, and respond to many different DNA lesions. Consideration of DNA polymerase error rates and possible consequences of excess gratuitous excision of perfectly paired (homoduplex) DNA in vivo suggests that MMR needs to discriminate against homoduplex DNA by three to six orders of magnitude. However, numerous binding studies using MMR base-mispair-recognition proteins, bacterial MutS or eukaryotic MSH2.MSH6 (MutSalpha), have typically shown discrimination factors between mismatched and homoduplex DNA to be 5-30, depending on the binding conditions, the particular mismatches, and the DNA-sequence contexts. Thus, downstream post-binding steps must increase MMR discrimination without interfering with the versatility needed to recognize a large variety of base-mismatches and lesions. We use a complex but highly MMR-active model system, human nuclear extracts mixed with plasmid substrates containing specific mismatches and defined nicks 0.15 kbp away, to measure the earliest quantifiable committed step in mismatch correction, initiation of mismatch-provoked 3'-5' excision at the nicks. We compared these results to binding of purified MutSalpha to synthetic oligoduplexes containing the same mismatches in the same sequence contexts, under conditions very similar to those prevailing in the nuclear extracts. Discrimination against homoduplex DNA, only two-to five-fold in the binding studies, increased to 60- to 230-fold or more for excision initiation, depending on the particular mismatches. Remarkably, the mismatch-preference order for excision initiation was substantially altered from the order for hMutSalpha binding. This suggests that post-binding steps not only strongly discriminate against homoduplex DNA, but do so by mechanisms not tightly constrained by initial binding preferences. Pairs of homoduplexes (40, 50, and 70 bp) prepared from synthetic oligomers or cut out of plasmids showed virtually identical hMutSalpha binding affinities, suggesting that high hMutSalpha binding to homoduplex DNA is not the result of misincorporations or lesions introduced during chemical synthesis. Intrinsic affinities of MutS homologs for perfectly paired DNA may help these proteins efficiently position themselves to carry out subsequent mismatch-specific steps in MMR pathways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16213799     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  6 in total

1.  Dual role of MutS glutamate 38 in DNA mismatch discrimination and in the authorization of repair.

Authors:  Joyce H G Lebbink; Dubravka Georgijevic; Ganesh Natrajan; Alexander Fish; Herrie H K Winterwerp; Titia K Sixma; Niels de Wind
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Deciphering the mismatch recognition cycle in MutS and MSH2-MSH6 using normal-mode analysis.

Authors:  Shayantani Mukherjee; Sean M Law; Michael Feig
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Physiology of the read-write genome.

Authors:  James A Shapiro
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Identifying an interaction site between MutH and the C-terminal domain of MutL by crosslinking, affinity purification, chemical coding and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Robert Ahrends; Jan Kosinski; Dieter Kirsch; Laura Manelyte; Luis Giron-Monzon; Lars Hummerich; Oliver Schulz; Bernhard Spengler; Peter Friedhoff
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-06-13       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  The molecular mechanism of DNA damage recognition by MutS homologs and its consequences for cell death response.

Authors:  Freddie R Salsbury; Jill E Clodfelter; Michael B Gentry; Thomas Hollis; Karin Drotschmann Scarpinato
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-04-28       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Human DNA mismatch repair: coupling of mismatch recognition to strand-specific excision.

Authors:  Huixian Wang; John B Hays
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 16.971

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.