Literature DB >> 16213681

Interfield differences in intensity and frequency representation of evoked potentials in rat auditory cortex.

Hirokazu Takahashi1, Masayuki Nakao, Kimitaka Kaga.   

Abstract

Existing studies have demonstrated interfield differences in functional organizations and neuronal responsive properties at a single neuron level in the auditory cortex, suggesting complicated encoding of sound frequency and intensity. The objective of present work is, by characterizing cortical auditory evoked potentials (AEPs), to bridge neural characteristics between a single neuron and field levels and to identify the interfield differences in the auditory cortex specifically in terms of spatial representation, which will be useful in guiding future unit studies. The AEP mapping found that each of auditory fields, which could be identified by a different tonotopic representation, showed interfield differences in an intensity-dependent spatial change, amplitude, latency, and amplitude-SPL (sound pressure level) function. These results also showed that many aspects of cortical representation were based on the cochlear properties, yet some were inconsistent. The intensity-dependent shift of activation in AI paralleled the tonotopic axis, which was similar to the place code in cochlea, while the shift in AAF and VAF did not parallel. Nevertheless, the amplitude-SPL function suggested that an underlying mechanism of all these shifts can be a compressive nonlinearity to CF tone, which is possibly formed in the cochlea and still preserved in the cortex. These results suggest that each field modifies the representation to handle a different aspect of sound information, which can be better analyzed than the cochlear representation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16213681     DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2005.05.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  10 in total

1.  Attention modifies sound level detection in young children.

Authors:  Elyse S Sussman; Mitchell Steinschneider
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.464

2.  Auditory brainstem stimulation with a conformable microfabricated array elicits responses with tonotopically organized components.

Authors:  Amélie A Guex; Ariel Edward Hight; Shreya Narasimhan; Nicolas Vachicouras; Daniel J Lee; Stéphanie P Lacour; M Christian Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Cochlear pericyte responses to acoustic trauma and the involvement of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha and vascular endothelial growth factor.

Authors:  Xiaorui Shi
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 4.307

4.  Consequences of unilateral hearing loss: cortical adjustment to unilateral deprivation.

Authors:  K A Hutson; D Durham; T Imig; D L Tucci
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-12-28       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Tonotopic and Field-Specific Representation of Long-Lasting Sustained Activity in Rat Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Tomoyo I Shiramatsu; Takahiro Noda; Kan Akutsu; Hirokazu Takahashi
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.492

6.  Stimulus Phase Locking of Cortical Oscillations for Rhythmic Tone Sequences in Rats.

Authors:  Takahiro Noda; Tomoki Amemiya; Tomoyo I Shiramatsu; Hirokazu Takahashi
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  Cortical mapping of mismatch negativity with deviance detection property in rat.

Authors:  Tomoyo Isoguchi Shiramatsu; Ryohei Kanzaki; Hirokazu Takahashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Stimulus phase locking of cortical oscillation for auditory stream segregation in rats.

Authors:  Takahiro Noda; Ryohei Kanzaki; Hirokazu Takahashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Topographic Distribution of Stimulus-Specific Adaptation across Auditory Cortical Fields in the Anesthetized Rat.

Authors:  Javier Nieto-Diego; Manuel S Malmierca
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 8.029

10.  Information flow in the rat thalamo-cortical system: spontaneous vs. stimulus-evoked activities.

Authors:  Kotaro Ishizu; Tomoyo I Shiramatsu; Rie Hitsuyu; Masafumi Oizumi; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Hirokazu Takahashi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.