Literature DB >> 16213665

The future of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in psychiatric treatment.

Steven Taylor1, Murray B Stein.   

Abstract

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are widely prescribed and widely regarded as a first-line treatment for depression. Yet, a growing body of evidence indicates that these agents are only moderately more effective than placebo in treating major depressive disorder. In recent years, it has been debated whether SSRIs offer any clinically meaningful advantage over placebos. As part of this debate, it has been argued that these agents are first-line treatments for some forms of depression but not necessarily for others. The present paper examines two hypotheses that are central to these issues. The first hypothesis is that SSRIs are more effective than placebo for some types of depression but not for others. The second is that SSRIs are more effective than psychotherapies for some types of depression than others. A review of the empirical literature reveals three main classifications of depression that are relevant to the first hypothesis: (a) more vs. less severe depression, (b) melancholic vs. non-melancholic depression, and (c) depression defined according to associated genetic factors (particularly the long vs. short allele of the serotonin transporter gene promoter). There is no strong or consistent support for (a) or (b). There is, however, emerging and consistent evidence for (c), and so the first hypothesis is tentatively supported, but only for (c). Most of the empirical evidence does not support the second hypothesis. Psychotherapies (cognitive-behavioral and interpersonal therapies) and SSRIs generally have equivalent efficacy, regardless of the severity of depression. The research literature also suggests a third hypothesis that remains to be evaluated: that SSRIs are more effective for treating anxiety disorders (and possibly other disorders) than they are for treating depression. If that hypothesis is supported by subsequent research, then the future of SSRIs may lie largely in the treatment of anxiety disorders, and in the management of particular subtypes of depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16213665     DOI: 10.1016/j.mehy.2005.08.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Hypotheses        ISSN: 0306-9877            Impact factor:   1.538


  4 in total

1.  Genetic and environmental origins of health anxiety: a twin study.

Authors:  Steven Taylor; Dana S Thordarson; Kerry L Jang; Gordon J G Asmundson
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 49.548

2.  Antidepressant-like activity of Tagetes lucida Cav. is mediated by 5-HT(1A) and 5-HT(2A) receptors.

Authors:  H Bonilla-Jaime; G Guadarrama-Cruz; F J Alarcon-Aguilar; O Limón-Morales; G Vazquez-Palacios
Journal:  J Nat Med       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 2.343

3.  Evaluation and comparison of the antidepressant-like activity of Artemisia dracunculus and Stachys lavandulifolia ethanolic extracts: an in vivo study.

Authors:  Reza Jahani; Dariush Khaledyan; Ali Jahani; Elham Jamshidi; Mohammad Kamalinejad; Mona Khoramjouy; Mehrdad Faizi
Journal:  Res Pharm Sci       Date:  2019-12-11

4.  Evaluating the Antidepressant Effect of Verbena officinalis L. (Vervain) Aqueous Extract in Adult Rats.

Authors:  Amina Bekara; Ali Amazouz; Tahir Benyamina Douma
Journal:  Basic Clin Neurosci       Date:  2020-01-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.