A Tabibi1, N Simforoosh, P Abadpour, H R Gholamrezaie, M Nafar. 1. Department of Kidney Transplantation, Shahid Labbafi-nejad Medical Center, Urology Nephrology Research Center (UNRC), Tehran, Iran. tabibiali@yahoo.com
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We compared perioperative and intraoperative data of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) who received a renal allograft without native nephrectomy with ADPKD patients who underwent concomitant native nephrectomy of massively enlarged kidneys and renal transplantation to determine whether the latter approach is reasonable and safe. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1987 to December 2003, 13 patients with ESRD due to ADPKD were stratified as 6 patients who underwent bilateral and 7 patients who underwent unilateral native nephrectomy in conjunction with renal transplantation (group A), versus 20 patients with ESRD due to ADPKD underwent renal transplantation without native nephrectomy (group B). Operative time, need for intraoperative transfusion, time to oral intake, duration of hospital stay, serum creatinine level on the day of discharge, readmission rate, and postoperative complications were compared for both groups. RESULTS: Mean intraoperative duration was significantly longer for patients in group A, but there was no statistically significant difference in the findings between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant native nephrectomy of massively enlarged kidneys at the time of renal transplantation is reasonable and safe for patients with ESRD due to ADPKD.
OBJECTIVES: We compared perioperative and intraoperative data of patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) who received a renal allograft without native nephrectomy with ADPKD patients who underwent concomitant native nephrectomy of massively enlarged kidneys and renal transplantation to determine whether the latter approach is reasonable and safe. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1987 to December 2003, 13 patients with ESRD due to ADPKD were stratified as 6 patients who underwent bilateral and 7 patients who underwent unilateral native nephrectomy in conjunction with renal transplantation (group A), versus 20 patients with ESRD due to ADPKD underwent renal transplantation without native nephrectomy (group B). Operative time, need for intraoperative transfusion, time to oral intake, duration of hospital stay, serum creatinine level on the day of discharge, readmission rate, and postoperative complications were compared for both groups. RESULTS: Mean intraoperative duration was significantly longer for patients in group A, but there was no statistically significant difference in the findings between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant native nephrectomy of massively enlarged kidneys at the time of renal transplantation is reasonable and safe for patients with ESRD due to ADPKD.