Literature DB >> 16211386

An epigenetic approach to the treatment of advanced MDS; the experience with the DNA demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in 177 patients.

P W Wijermans1, M Lübbert, G Verhoef, V Klimek, A Bosly.   

Abstract

During the last 10 years, three European phase II studies were performed to investigate the treatment of elderly patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with low-dose 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine (decitabine, DAC). All these European trial data were reviewed on the basis of the International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk criteria and the response criteria as recently published by an international working group. To investigate the results in a larger cohort of patients and to determine risk factors, all data were pooled with some observations from the PCH 95-06 US phase II study. The response rate in the 177 patients evaluated (median age 70 years) was 49%. The median response duration was 36 weeks, and the median survival was 15 months. Analysis of the data according to sex, age, French-American-British classification, percentage of blasts in the bone marrow, IPSS risk group, lactate dehydrogenase and cytogenetics did not reveal any factor predictive of response. Overall, 69% of patients benefited, including those with stable disease during therapy. Response duration was significantly shorter with increasing risk (according to the IPSS classification). Haemoglobin level and neutrophil count showed an inverse correlation to the IPSS classification. Univariate analysis showed a significantly inferior survival for elderly patients (>75 years of age) and for those with high levels of serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (more than two times the normal values). Patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities according to the IPSS risk criteria showed better overall survival than those with intermediate-risk abnormalities. When analysed according to the IPSS risk classification, high-risk patients had worse survival prospects following decitabine therapy than those with intermediate risk; however, compared to the originally reported IPPS outcomes for high-risk patients, they probably showed better survival. During the treatment period, 18% of the patients progressed towards acute leukaemia. Decitabine showed a rather low toxicity profile in this elderly patient group. In conclusion, low-dose decitabine is an active drug for the treatment of MDS patients, even for those older than 75 years with bad prognostic characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16211386     DOI: 10.1007/s00277-005-0012-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Hematol        ISSN: 0939-5555            Impact factor:   3.673


  18 in total

Review 1.  Epigenetic therapy of leukemia: An update.

Authors:  Nitin Jain; Adriana Rossi; Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 5.085

2.  The association between non-Hodgkin lymphoma and methylation of p73.

Authors:  Jing-Hong Pei; Sai-Qun Luo; Yan Zhong; Jiang-Hua Chen; Hua-Wu Xiao; Wei-Xin Hu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2011-08-03

3.  HDAC inhibitors and decitabine are highly synergistic and associated with unique gene-expression and epigenetic profiles in models of DLBCL.

Authors:  Matko Kalac; Luigi Scotto; Enrica Marchi; Jennifer Amengual; Venkatraman E Seshan; Govind Bhagat; Netha Ulahannan; Violetta V Leshchenko; Alexis M Temkin; Samir Parekh; Benjamin Tycko; Owen A O'Connor
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Differential response to hypomethylating agents based on sex: a report on behalf of the MDS Clinical Research Consortium (MDS CRC).

Authors:  Amy E DeZern; Amer M Zeidan; John Barnard; Wesley Hand; Najla Al Ali; Francis Brown; Cassie Zimmerman; Gail J Roboz; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; David P Steensma; Rami S Komrokji; Mikkael A Sekeres
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2016-10-24

5.  A multicenter phase II trial of decitabine as first-line treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia judged unfit for induction chemotherapy.

Authors:  Michael Lübbert; Björn H Rüter; Rainer Claus; Claudia Schmoor; Mathias Schmid; Ulrich Germing; Andrea Kuendgen; Volker Rethwisch; Arnold Ganser; Uwe Platzbecker; Oliver Galm; Wolfram Brugger; Gerhard Heil; Björn Hackanson; Barbara Deschler; Konstanze Döhner; Anne Hagemeijer; Pierre W Wijermans; Hartmut Döhner
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 6.  Outlook and Management of Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes Failed by Hypomethylating Agents.

Authors:  Daniel A Roberts; David P Steensma
Journal:  Curr Hematol Malig Rep       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 3.952

Review 7.  Epigenetic treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and acute myeloid leukemias.

Authors:  Giuseppe Leone; Francesco D'Alò; Giuseppe Zardo; Maria Teresa Voso; Clara Nervi
Journal:  Curr Med Chem       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  An update on the safety and efficacy of decitabine in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes.

Authors:  Jacqueline S Garcia; Nitin Jain; Lucy A Godley
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Increased CDA expression/activity in males contributes to decreased cytidine analog half-life and likely contributes to worse outcomes with 5-azacytidine or decitabine therapy.

Authors:  Reda Z Mahfouz; Ania Jankowska; Quteba Ebrahem; Xiaorong Gu; Valeria Visconte; Ali Tabarroki; Pramod Terse; Joseph Covey; Kenneth Chan; Yonghua Ling; Kory J Engelke; Mikkael A Sekeres; Ramon Tiu; Jaroslaw Maciejewski; Tomas Radivoyevitch; Yogen Saunthararajah
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Maintenance Therapy with Decitabine after Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation for Acute Myelogenous Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome.

Authors:  Iskra Pusic; Jaebok Choi; Mark A Fiala; Feng Gao; Matthew Holt; Amanda F Cashen; Ravi Vij; Camille N Abboud; Keith E Stockerl-Goldstein; Meghan A Jacoby; Geoffrey L Uy; Peter Westervelt; John F DiPersio
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.