Literature DB >> 16210552

Poor outcomes in patients who do not receive intravenous tissue plasminogen activator because of mild or improving ischemic stroke.

Eric E Smith1, Abdul R Abdullah, Iva Petkovska, Eric Rosenthal, Walter J Koroshetz, Lee H Schwamm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Some patients with mild or improving ischemic stroke symptoms do not receive intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) because they look "too good to treat" (TGT); however, some have poor outcomes.
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from a prospective single-center study between 2002 and 2004. TGT patients were those arriving within 3 hours of symptom onset and not treated with intravenous tPA solely because of mild or improving symptoms.
RESULTS: Of 128 patients presenting within 3 hours, 41 (34%) were not given tPA because of mild or improving stroke. Of the TGT patients, 11 of 41 (27%) died or were not discharged home because of neurological worsening (n=6) or persistent "mild" neurological deficit (n=5). No single variable at presentation was associated with death or lack of home discharge. There were 10 of 41 TGT patients (24%) who had > or =4-point improvement in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score before tPA decision; these patients were more likely to have subsequent neurological worsening (relative risk, 4.1, 95% CI, 1.1 to 15.4; P=0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A substantial minority of patients deemed too good for intravenous tPA were unable to be discharged home. A re-evaluation of the stroke severity criteria for tPA eligibility may be indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16210552     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000185798.78817.f3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  70 in total

Review 1.  Management of acute ischemic stroke: time is brain.

Authors:  Marilyn M Rymner; Naveed Akhtar; Coleman Martin; Debbie Summers
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct

2.  Emergent Neurovascular Imaging: A Necessity for the Work-Up of Minor Stroke and TIA.

Authors:  S B Coutts; M Goyal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 3.  Critical Care of Brain Reperfusion.

Authors:  Shailesh Male; Chris Nickele; Lucas Elijovich
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.081

4.  Lower NIH stroke scale scores are required to accurately predict a good prognosis in posterior circulation stroke.

Authors:  Violiza Inoa; Abraham W Aron; Ilene Staff; Gilbert Fortunato; Lauren H Sansing
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.762

Review 5.  Changing contraindications for t-PA in acute stroke: review of 20 years since NINDS.

Authors:  Sarah Parker; Yasmin Ali
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  [Difficult decisions in stroke therapy].

Authors:  M Endres; M Grond; W Hacke; M Ebinger; P D Schellinger; M Dichgans
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.214

Review 7.  Minor ischemic stroke: Triaging, disposition, and outcome.

Authors:  Shadi Yaghi; Joshua Z Willey; Pooja Khatri
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2016-04

8.  The quality of treatment of hyperacute ischemic stroke in Canada: a retrospective chart audit.

Authors:  Aravind Ganesh; Marie Camden; Patrice Lindsay; Moira K Kapral; Robert Coté; Jiming Fang; Brandon Zagorski; Michael Douglas Hill
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2014-10-01

9.  Patient refusal of thrombolytic therapy for suspected acute ischemic stroke.

Authors:  F S Vahidy; M H Rahbar; A P Lal; J C Grotta; S I Savitz
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 5.266

Review 10.  Absolute and Relative Contraindications to IV rt-PA for Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Jennifer E Fugate; Alejandro A Rabinstein
Journal:  Neurohospitalist       Date:  2015-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.