Literature DB >> 16210123

Percutaneous tracheostomy after mechanical ventricular assist device implantation.

Igor D Gregoric1, Matthew T Harting, Roman Kosir, Vijay S Patel, Jus Ksela, Gregory N Messner, Saverio La Francesca, O H Frazier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies have shown that percutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is safe and cost-effective for patients recovering from surgery that requires a median sternotomy. We report our experience with PDT in patients receiving mechanical cardiac assistance.
METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent ventricular assist device implantation at our institution between July 2000 and July 2003, and who subsequently required long-term ventilatory support during the same hospital admission. Data obtained from the records included demographic and biometric information, primary diagnosis, early (< or =30days) and late (>30days) complications, date and cause of death, type of anti-coagulation used at the time of tracheostomy, and various coagulation measures.
RESULTS: Thirty-one consecutive patients (29 men, 2 women; mean age, 56 years) had PDT after ventricular assist device implantation. Four minor complications occurred among 3 of the patients (10%), including 3 early complications (2 peristomal oozing and 1 peristomal cellulitis) and 1 late complication (recurrent peristomal cellulitis), none of which affected long-term outcome. No major adverse events, long-term complications, or deaths resulted from the PDT procedure.
CONCLUSIONS: PDT is feasible for patients with mechanical support devices who require long-term ventilatory support. Although some of these patients are coagulopathic, our results indicate that PDT is safe and effective in this challenging patient population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16210123     DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2004.12.109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant        ISSN: 1053-2498            Impact factor:   10.247


  5 in total

1.  Tracheostomy while on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Comparison of Percutaneous and Open Procedures.

Authors:  Ismael A Salas De Armas; Kha Dinh; Bindu Akkanti; Pushan Jani; Reshma Hussain; Lisa Janowiak; Kayla Kutilek; Manish K Patel; Mehmet H Akay; Rahat Hussain; Jayeshkumar Patel; Chandni Patel; Yafen Liang; John Zaki; Biswajit Kar; Igor D Gregoric
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2020-12

2.  Managing drugs and devices in patients with permanent ventricular assist devices.

Authors:  Martin Cadeiras; Manuel von Bayern; Mario C Deng
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-08

3.  Safety of percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in patients on extracorporeal lung support.

Authors:  Stephan Braune; Susanne Kienast; Johannes Hadem; Olaf Wiesner; Dominic Wichmann; Axel Nierhaus; Marcel Simon; Tobias Welte; Stefan Kluge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Percutaneous tracheostomy in patients on anticoagulants.

Authors:  Laura Pasin; Elena Frati; Luca Cabrini; Giovanni Landoni; Pasquale Nardelli; Tiziana Bove; Maria Grazia Calabro; Anna Mara Scandroglio; Federico Pappalardo; Alberto Zangrillo
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

5.  Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy in patients with mechanical circulatory support: Is the procedure safe?

Authors:  Şerife Bektaş; Mine Çavuş; Sema Turan
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 0.332

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.