Literature DB >> 16209981

Comprehensive assessment of patients after coronary artery bypass grafting by 16-detector-row computed tomography.

Liesbeth P Salm1, Jeroen J Bax, J Wouter Jukema, Joanne D Schuijf, Hubert W Vliegen, Hildo J Lamb, Ernst E van der Wall, Albert de Roos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) is a versatile modality to evaluate stenoses in native coronary arteries and bypass grafts. Acquired MDCT data can additionally be used to assess left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The purpose was to use MDCT for the assessment of bypass graft and coronary artery disease combined with evaluation of LVEF.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients underwent 16-detector-row CT examination and coronary angiography. Bypass grafts and nongrafted coronary artery segments at MDCT were evaluated on eligibility, patency, and > or = 50% stenosis. The MDCT data set was used to calculate LVEF and was divided into patients with no/subendocardial/transmural myocardial infarctions (MIs).
RESULTS: Ninety vessels were evaluated: 14 arterial grafts/53 vein grafts/23 nongrafted vessels. Of 225 segments, 17 were ineligible for evaluation because of metal clips. With MDCT, patency in segments of arterial grafts/vein grafts/nongrafted vessels could be evaluated with high accuracy in 100%/100%/97% of segments. In arterial grafts, stenoses > or = 50% did not occur at angiography, which was for all eligible segments correctly diagnosed at MDCT. Stenosis > or = 50% could be correctly detected by MDCT with a sensitivity/specificity of 100%/94% for vein grafts and 100%/89% for nongrafted vessels. Negative predictive value was 100% for vein grafts and nongrafted vessels. In patients with transmural MI, MDCT revealed a significant lower LVEF as compared with patients without or with subendocardial MI (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: Comprehensive assessment of bypass grafts, nongrafted vessels, and LVEF is feasible with MDCT. Owing to the high negative predictive value this noninvasive approach may be used as gatekeeper before coronary angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16209981     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.11.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  16 in total

Review 1.  Multislice CT coronary angiography: how to do it and what is the current clinical performance?

Authors:  Filippo Cademartiri; Joanne D Schuijf; Nico R Mollet; Patrizia Malagutti; Giuseppe Runza; Jeroen J Bax; Pim J de Feyter
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion--is it possible?

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Khurram Nasir; Roberto C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Accurate estimation of global and regional cardiac function by retrospectively gated multidetector row computed tomography: comparison with cine magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Bénédicte Belge; Emmanuel Coche; Agnès Pasquet; Jean-Louis J Vanoverschelde; Bernhard L Gerber
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Cardiac CT angiography after coronary bypass surgery: prevalence of incidental findings.

Authors:  Jeffrey Mueller; Jean Jeudy; Robert Poston; Charles S White
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 5.  Atherosclerosis regression: is low-density lipoprotein or high-density lipoprotein the answer?

Authors:  Stephen J Nicholls; E Murat Tuzcu; Steven E Nissen
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  64 Slice multi-detector row cardiac CT.

Authors:  Harpreet K Pannu; Pamela T Johnson; Elliot K Fishman
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-10-22

7.  MSCT evaluation of patients with prior coronary bypass surgery: what we have and what we lack.

Authors:  Nuno Bettencourt; Amedeo Chiribiri; Eike Nagel
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Transitioning from 16-slice to 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: are we really making progress?

Authors:  Razi Khan; Sapna Rawal; Mark J Eisenberg
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Diagnostic accuracy of 16- versus 64-slice multidetector computed tomography angiography in the evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafts: a comparative study.

Authors:  Levent Şahiner; Ugur Canpolat; Kudret Aytemir; Tuncay Hazirolan; Hikmet Yorgun; Ergün Bariş Kaya; Ali Oto
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-07-25

10.  The measurement of opening angle and orifice area of a bileaflet mechanical valve using multidetector computed tomography.

Authors:  Dong-Hyeon Lee; Ho-Joong Youn; Sung-Bo Shim; Sun-Hee Lee; Jung-Im Jung; Seung-Eun Jung; Yun-Seok Choi; Chul-Soo Park; Yong-Seog Oh; Wook-Sung Chung; Jae-Hyung Kim
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 3.243

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.