Literature DB >> 16209961

Electrocardiographic infarct size assessment after thrombolysis: insights from the Acute Myocardial Infarction STudy ADenosine (AMISTAD) trial.

Alejandro Barbagelata1, Marcelo F Di Carli, Robert M Califf, Jyotsna Garg, Yochai Birnbaum, Liliana Grinfeld, Raymond J Gibbons, Christopher B Granger, Shaun G Goodman, Galen S Wagner, Kenneth W Mahaffey.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive methods are needed to evaluate reperfusion success in patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). The AMISTAD trial was analyzed to compare MI size and myocardial salvage determined by electrocardiogram (ECG) with technetium Tc 99m sestamibi single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) imaging.
METHODS: Of 236 patients enrolled in AMISTAD, 166 (70 %) with no ECG confounding factors and no prior MI were included in this analysis. Of these, group 1 (126 patients, 53%) had final infarct size (FIS) available by both ECG and SPECT. Group 2 (56 patients, 24%) had myocardium at risk, FIS, and salvage index (SI) assessed by both SPECT and ECG techniques. Aldrich/Clemmensen scores for myocardium at risk and the Selvester QRS score for final MI size were used. Salvage index was calculated as follows: SI = (myocardium at risk-FIS)/(myocardium at risk).
RESULTS: In group 1, FIS was 15% (6, 24) as measured by ECG and 11% (2, 27) as measured by SPECT. In the adenosine group, FIS was 12% (6, 21) and 11% (2, 22). In the placebo group, FIS was 16.5% (7.5, 24) and 11.5% (3.0, 38.5) by ECG and SPECT, respectively. The overall correlation between SPECT and ECG for FIS was 0.58 (P = .0001): 0.60 in the placebo group (P = .0001) and 0.54 (P = .0001) in the adenosine group. In group 2, myocardium at risk was 23% (17, 30) and 26% (10, 50) with ECG and SPECT, respectively (P = .0066). Final infarct size was 17% (6, 21) and 12% (1, 24) (P < .0001). The SI was 29% (-7, 57) and 46% (15, 79) with ECG and SPECT, respectively (P = .0510).
CONCLUSIONS: The ECG measurement of infarct size has a moderate relationship with SPECT infarct size measurements in the population with available assessments. This ECG algorithm must further be validated on clinical outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16209961     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  3 in total

1.  The Selvester QRS Score is more accurate than Q waves and fragmented QRS complexes using the Mason-Likar configuration in estimating infarct volume in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Mary G Carey; Andrew J Luisi; Sunil Baldwa; Salah Al-Zaiti; Marc J Veneziano; Robert A deKemp; John M Canty; James A Fallavollita
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 1.438

2.  Automatically computed ECG algorithm for the quantification of myocardial scar and the prediction of mortality.

Authors:  Patrick Badertscher; Ivo Strebel; Ursina Honegger; Nicolas Schaerli; Deborah Mueller; Christian Puelacher; Max Wagener; Roger Abächerli; Joan Walter; Zaid Sabti; Lorraine Sazgary; Stella Marbot; Jeanne du Fay de Lavallaz; Raphael Twerenbold; Jasper Boeddinghaus; Thomas Nestelberger; Nikola Kozhuharov; Tobias Breidthardt; Samyut Shrestha; Dayana Flores; Carmela Schumacher; Damian Wild; Stefan Osswald; Michael J Zellweger; Christian Mueller; Tobias Reichlin
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  The ischemic preconditioning effect of adenosine in patients with ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Bita Sadigh; Miguel Quintana; Christer Sylvén; Margareta Berglund; Lars Ake Brodin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 2.062

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.