Literature DB >> 16209452

Wavefront aberration outcomes of LASIK for high myopia and high hyperopia.

Konrad Pesudovs1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the higher order aberrations at the corneal first surface after conventional LASIK for high myopia and high hyperopia.
METHODS: This was a retrospective study using a convenience sample with subjects divided into five groups by level of refractive correction. Group 1 were normals, having no eye disease or previous surgery, but may have had refractive error. Group 2 had low myopia (-1.00 to -5.87 D), group 3 high myopia (> 6.00 D), group 4 low hyperopia (+1.00 to +3.87 D), and group 5 high hyperopia (> 4.00 D). LASIK was performed using a Technolas 217 laser. Corneal topography was taken with Orbscan II, and Placido data exported to VOLPro software v6.71. Wavefront aberrations were determined for a 6.0-mm pupil.
RESULTS: The study included 264 subjects-group 1 (normal), n=204; group 2 (low myopia), n=20; group 3 (high myopia), n=20; group 4 (low hyperopia), n=10; and group 5 (high hyperopia), n=10. The spherical equivalent refractive error corrected (mean +/-SD) was 0.00 +/- 0.00 D in group 1, -3.92 +/- 1.47 D in group 2, -9.53 +/- 2.06 D in group 3, +2.49 +/- 0.51 D in group 4, and +5.54 +/- 1.22 D in group 5. The total higher order root-mean-square (RMS) wavefront aberration was 0.38 +/- 0.07 microm in group 1, 0.69 +/- 0.22 microm in group 2, 1.36 +/- 1.79 microm in group 3, 0.64 +/- 0.34 microm in group 4, and 1.76 +/- 0.54 microm in group 5. Spherical aberration was 0.25 +/- 0.06 mcirom in group 1, 0.45 +/- 0.11 microm in group 2, 0.64 +/- 0.29 microm in group 3, -0.11 +/- 0.15 microm in group 4, and -0.56 +/- 0.22 microm in group 5. The refractive correction (Rx) was highly correlated to total higher order RMS for myopic correction higher order RMS = 0.38 - 0.07 Rx, R2=0.52, and for hyperopic correction higher order RMS = 0.18 + 0.28 Rx, R2 = 0.75.
CONCLUSIONS: Conventional LASIK increases all corneal higher order aberrations with induced aberrations increasing with the magnitude of refractive correction. High refractive corrections, both myopic (>6.00 D) and hyperopic (>5.00 D), can lead to very high levels of corneal higher order aberrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16209452     DOI: 10.3928/1081-597X-20050901-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  15 in total

1.  Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 2.  The posterior chamber phakic refractive lens (PRL): a review.

Authors:  R J Pérez-Cambrodí; D P Piñero; T Ferrer-Blasco; A Cerviño; R Brautaset
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Pilot study of hyperopic LASIK using the solid-state laser technology.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Francisco J Blanes-Mompó; Pedro Ruiz-Fortes; Rafael J Pérez-Cambrodí; Antonio Alzamora-Rodríguez
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Wave front aberrations induced from biomechanical effects after customized myopic laser refractive surgery in finite element model.

Authors:  Ruirui Du; Lihua Fang; Weijian Peng; Ruizhi Yang; Shifeng Nie; Huirong Xiao; Jiahui Gong; Yu Dai; Jiahao Deng
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-15       Impact factor: 2.031

5.  Higher-order aberrations after wavefront-optimized photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis.

Authors:  J Bradley Randleman; Claudia E Perez-Straziota; Michelle H Hu; Alfred J White; Evan S Loft; R Doyle Stulting
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  The association between femtosecond laser flap parameters and ocular aberrations after uncomplicated custom myopic LASIK.

Authors:  Christopher T Hood; Ronald R Krueger; Steven E Wilson
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 7.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Visual outcome after correcting the refractive error of large pupil patients with wavefront-guided ablation.

Authors:  Mounir A Khalifa; Waleed A Allam; Mohamed S Shaheen
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-03

9.  Changes in spherical aberration after various corneal surface ablation techniques.

Authors:  Hyun Seok Ahn; Jae Lim Chung; Eung Kweon Kim; Kyoung Yul Seo; Tae-Im Kim
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-28

10.  Cryopreservation of extracted corneal lenticules after small incision lenticule extraction for potential use in human subjects.

Authors:  Sri Ganesh; Sheetal Brar; Pallavi A Rao
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 2.651

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.