Literature DB >> 16208526

Markers of lacunar stroke in patients with moderate internal carotid artery stenosis.

Mauro Silvestrini1, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Roberto Baruffaldi, Sheila Catani, Francesco Tibuzzi, Claudia Altamura, Marco Bartolini, Leandro Provinciali, Fabrizio Vernieri.   

Abstract

The benefits of surgical correction of moderate internal carotid artery stenosis have been demonstrated only in symptomatic subjects. It is debatable whether patients with lacunar infarct ipsilateral to a moderate carotid stenosis may be considered symptomatic like those with large-artery stroke. The aim of the study was to seek markers capable of differentiating patients with lacunar or non-lacunar stroke ipsilateral to a moderate internal carotid artery stenosis. We enrolled 95 patients with a first stroke ipsilateral to a moderate (50-69 %) stenosis of the internal carotid artery and divided them into lacunar and non-lacunar stroke based on clinical presentation and neuroradiological findings; 34 subjects with asymptomatic moderate carotid stenosis and 31 normal individuals were also studied. Baseline characteristics; risk factors, cerebrovascular reactivity to hypercapnia evaluated by means of the breath-holding index (BHI), the presence and severity of carotid stenosis and intimamedia thickness (IMT) of the common carotid arteries were determined. There were 36 patients with lacunar and 59 with non-lacunar stroke. Degree of stenosis, and IMT and BHI ipsilateral to symptomatic stenosis were found to be significant independent predictors as each 10 % increase of stenosis carried a 4.3 higher probability of non-lacunar stroke (95 % CI: 1.91-9.51); each decimillimeter increment in IMT increased this probability by 1.45 (95 % CI: 1.10-1.92); and the risk odds ratio associated with each 0.1 increase in BHI was 1.88 (95 % CI: 1.33-2.66). A decrease in BHI of 0.1 thus carried a 90% greater probability of having a lacunar stroke. The results show that patients with moderate internal carotid artery stenosis and lacunar stroke can be differentiated from those with non-lacunar stroke on the basis of distinctive ultrasonographic findings. Further studies are needed to clarify whether our findings have pathogenetic implications and may be of help for the planning of different therapeutic strategies in patients with moderate internal carotid stenosis and lacunar or non-lacunar ipsilateral stroke.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16208526     DOI: 10.1007/s00415-005-0989-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol        ISSN: 0340-5354            Impact factor:   4.849


  32 in total

1.  Are lacunar strokes really different? A systematic review of differences in risk factor profiles between lacunar and nonlacunar infarcts.

Authors:  Caroline Jackson; Cathie Sudlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Editorial comment--time to burn the TOAST.

Authors:  William M Landau; Abdullah Nassief
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Estimation of cerebrovascular reactivity using transcranial Doppler, including the use of breath-holding as the vasodilatory stimulus.

Authors:  H S Markus; M J Harrison
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Carotid-artery intima and media thickness as a risk factor for myocardial infarction and stroke in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study Collaborative Research Group.

Authors:  D H O'Leary; J F Polak; R A Kronmal; T A Manolio; G L Burke; S K Wolfson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-01-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Evolution and testing of the lacunar hypothesis.

Authors:  J M Bamford; C P Warlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Outcome of carotid artery occlusion is predicted by cerebrovascular reactivity.

Authors:  F Vernieri; P Pasqualetti; F Passarelli; P M Rossini; M Silvestrini
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Does a relationship exist between carotid stenosis and lacunar infarction?

Authors:  J Tejada; E Díez-Tejedor; L Hernández-Echebarría; O Balboa
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-05-08       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Assessment: transcranial Doppler ultrasonography: report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.

Authors:  M A Sloan; A V Alexandrov; C H Tegeler; M P Spencer; L R Caplan; E Feldmann; L R Wechsler; D W Newell; C R Gomez; V L Babikian; D Lefkowitz; R S Goldman; C Armon; C Y Hsu; D S Goodin
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-05-11       Impact factor: 9.910

9.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis.

Authors:  H J M Barnett; D W Taylor; R B Haynes; D L Sackett; S J Peerless; G G Ferguson; A J Fox; R N Rankin; V C Hachinski; D O Wiebers; M Eliasziw
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-08-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Race-ethnicity and determinants of intracranial atherosclerotic cerebral infarction. The Northern Manhattan Stroke Study.

Authors:  R L Sacco; D E Kargman; Q Gu; M C Zamanillo
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  4 in total

1.  Profiles of lacunar and nonlacunar stroke.

Authors:  Glen C Jickling; Boryana Stamova; Bradley P Ander; Xinhua Zhan; Yingfang Tian; Dazhi Liu; Huichun Xu; S Claiborne Johnston; Piero Verro; Frank R Sharp
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 10.422

2.  Ultrasonographic markers of vascular risk in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Mauro Silvestrini; Claudia Altamura; Raffaella Cerqua; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Giovanna Viticchi; Leandro Provinciali; Luca Paulon; Fabrizio Vernieri
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 6.200

Review 3.  Imaging retinal microvascular manifestations of carotid artery disease in older adults: from diagnosis of ocular complications to understanding microvascular contributions to cognitive impairment.

Authors:  Lilla István; Cecilia Czakó; Ágnes Élő; Zsuzsanna Mihály; Péter Sótonyi; Andrea Varga; Zoltán Ungvári; Anna Csiszár; Andriy Yabluchanskiy; Shannon Conley; Tamás Csipő; Ágnes Lipecz; Illés Kovács; Zoltán Zsolt Nagy
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 7.713

4.  Carotid Artery Plaque Progression: Proposal of a New Predictive Score and Role of Carotid Intima-Media Thickness.

Authors:  Nicoletta Brunelli; Claudia Altamura; Carmelina Maria Costa; Riccardo Altavilla; Paola Palazzo; Paola Maggio; Marilena Marcosano; Fabrizio Vernieri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.