Literature DB >> 16208491

Contributions of marginal offspring to reproductive success of Nazca booby (Sula granti) parents: tests of multiple hypotheses.

Courtney A Humphries1, V Danilo Arevalo, Karen N Fischer, David J Anderson.   

Abstract

While obligate siblicide is a phylogenetically widespread behavior, known from plants, insects, birds, and other taxa, with important implications for life history evolution, comprehensive evaluations of its costs and benefits to parents are rare. We used 12 years of breeding and band resight data to evaluate the importance of several potential benefits that marginal offspring (the usual victims of obligate siblicide) could provide to parent Nazca boobies (Sula granti), a seabird. We found no evidence for the resource-tracking hypothesis: 99.95% of two-chick broods were reduced to one chick before fledging, and the single exceptional brood probably lost one chick between fledging and independence. Behavioral observations indicated that siblicidal aggression caused most mortality of marginal chicks, and at least contributed to the remainder. We also found no evidence that marginal offspring provide a food resource for other family members. Marginal chicks benefit parents via adoption into other families, and possibly also in the context of progeny choice, but these benefits are minor compared to the insurance that marginal chicks provide against early failure of core (first-hatched) offspring. Further evaluation of the Insurance Egg Hypothesis showed that marginal and core offspring are functionally equivalent in the absence of sibling interactions, and that core offspring incur no detectable costs from behaving siblicidally. Nazca boobies are truly obligate brood reducers, with parents receiving principally insurance benefits from marginal offspring, but many birds and other taxa exhibiting persistent, unconditional sibling aggression do not exhibit universal brood reduction. Insurance is only one of several potential benefits that marginal offspring can confer on parents, and a multi-hypothesis approach to decompose the different types of benefits is required to understand the evolution of clutch size in other obligately siblicidal species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16208491     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-005-0264-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  6 in total

1.  The evolution of parental optimism.

Authors:  D W Mock; L S Forbes
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF EGRET AND HERON BROOD REDUCTION.

Authors:  Douglas W Mock; Geoffrey A Parker
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The importance of hatching date for dominance in young shags.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.844

4.  Phylogeny and evolution of the Sulidae (Aves:Pelecaniformes): a test of alternative modes of speciation.

Authors:  V L Friesen; D J Anderson
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.286

5.  HYPOTHESES FOR THE PRODUCTION OF EXCESS ZYGOTES: MODELS OF BET-HEDGING AND SELECTIVE ABORTION.

Authors:  Jan Kozlowski; Stephen C Stearns
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Buffered development: resilience after aggressive subordination in infancy.

Authors:  Hugh Drummond; Roxana Torres; V V Krishnan
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2003-05-02       Impact factor: 3.926

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Decadal-scale variation in diet forecasts persistently poor breeding under ocean warming in a tropical seabird.

Authors:  Emily M Tompkins; Howard M Townsend; David J Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Perinatal androgens and adult behavior vary with nestling social system in siblicidal boobies.

Authors:  Martina S Müller; Julius F Brennecke; Elaine T Porter; Mary Ann Ottinger; David J Anderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.