Literature DB >> 16207900

Continuous culture--making a comeback?

Paul A Hoskisson1, Glyn Hobbs.   

Abstract

The heyday of continuous culture was in the 1960s, when its versatility and reproducibility were used to address fundamental problems in diverse microbiological fields such as biochemistry, ecology, genetics and physiology. The advent of molecular genetics in the 1970s and 1980s led to a decline in the popularity of continuous culture as a standard laboratory tool. The current trend of studying global proteomics, transcriptomics and metabolomics requires reproducible, reliable and biologically homogeneous datasets with which to approach a given problem. The use of continuous culture techniques can aid the acquisition of such data, and continuous cultures offer advantages over biologically heterogeneous batch cultures, where secondary growth and stress effects can often mask subtle physiological differences and trends. This review is intended to remind microbiologists of the value of continuous cultivation in a wide range of biological investigations, and describes some advantages and recent advances in applications of continuous culture in post-genomic studies.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16207900     DOI: 10.1099/mic.0.27924-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiology        ISSN: 1350-0872            Impact factor:   2.777


  66 in total

1.  The impact of Ivan Málek's continuous culture concept on bioprocessing.

Authors:  Pavel Kyslík; Aleš Prokop
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Concerted changes in gene expression and cell physiology of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. strain PCC 6803 during transitions between nitrogen and light-limited growth.

Authors:  Eneas Aguirre von Wobeser; Bas W Ibelings; Jasper Bok; Vladimir Krasikov; Jef Huisman; Hans C P Matthijs
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Coordination of growth rate, cell cycle, stress response, and metabolic activity in yeast.

Authors:  Matthew J Brauer; Curtis Huttenhower; Edoardo M Airoldi; Rachel Rosenstein; John C Matese; David Gresham; Viktor M Boer; Olga G Troyanskaya; David Botstein
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 4.138

4.  Physiological changes in rhizobia after growth in peat extract may be related to improved desiccation tolerance.

Authors:  Andrea Casteriano; Meredith A Wilkes; Rosalind Deaker
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Characteristics of the freshwater cyanobacterium Microcystis aeruginosa grown in iron-limited continuous culture.

Authors:  T C Dang; M Fujii; A L Rose; M Bligh; T D Waite
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 6.  The functional basis of adaptive evolution in chemostats.

Authors:  David Gresham; Jungeui Hong
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 16.408

7.  Acclimation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to low temperature: a chemostat-based transcriptome analysis.

Authors:  Siew Leng Tai; Pascale Daran-Lapujade; Michael C Walsh; Jack T Pronk; Jean-Marc Daran
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 4.138

8.  Oxygen response of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae EC1118 grown under carbon-sufficient, nitrogen-limited enological conditions.

Authors:  Felipe F Aceituno; Marcelo Orellana; Jorge Torres; Sebastián Mendoza; Alex W Slater; Francisco Melo; Eduardo Agosin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Nutrient control of eukaryote cell growth: a systems biology study in yeast.

Authors:  Alex Gutteridge; Pinar Pir; Juan I Castrillo; Philip D Charles; Kathryn S Lilley; Stephen G Oliver
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2010-05-24       Impact factor: 7.431

10.  Combinatorial effects of environmental parameters on transcriptional regulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a quantitative analysis of a compendium of chemostat-based transcriptome data.

Authors:  Theo A Knijnenburg; Jean-Marc G Daran; Marcel A van den Broek; Pascale As Daran-Lapujade; Johannes H de Winde; Jack T Pronk; Marcel J T Reinders; Lodewyk F A Wessels
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.