Hanne Dagfinrud1, Tore K Kvien, Kåre B Hagen. 1. Section for Health Science, University of Oslo, PO Box 1153, Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway. h.s.dagfinrud@medisin.uio.no
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To update the Cochrane review on the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions in the management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: All randomized studies available in systematic searches (electronic databases, contact with authors, reference lists) up to February 2004 were included. Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed the validity of included trials, and extracted data. Investigators were contacted to obtain missing information. RESULTS: Six trials with a total of 561 participants were included. Two trials compared individualized home exercise programs with no intervention. Low quality evidence for effects in favor of the home exercise program was found in physical function and spinal mobility [absolute benefit 10.3 cm on fingertip to floor distance; relative percentage difference (RPD) 37%)]. Further, the trials showed low quality evidence for no group differences in pain. Three trials compared supervised group physiotherapy with an individualized home exercise program. Moderate quality evidence for effectiveness was found in patient global assessment and spinal mobility in favor of the supervised group. The trials showed moderate quality evidence for no differences in pain intensity between the groups. One trial compared a 3-week inpatient spa-exercise therapy followed by weekly outpatient group physiotherapy with weekly outpatient group physiotherapy alone. Moderate quality evidence was found for effects in pain (absolute benefit 0.9 cm on visual analog scale; RPD 19%), physical function (absolute benefit 1 cm; RPD 24%), and patient global assessment (absolute benefit 1.3 cm; RPD 27%), in favor of the combined spa-exercise therapy. CONCLUSION: The current best available evidence suggests that physiotherapy is beneficial for people with AS. However, it is still not clear which treatment protocol should be recommended in the management of AS.
OBJECTIVE: To update the Cochrane review on the effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions in the management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). METHODS: All randomized studies available in systematic searches (electronic databases, contact with authors, reference lists) up to February 2004 were included. Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion, assessed the validity of included trials, and extracted data. Investigators were contacted to obtain missing information. RESULTS: Six trials with a total of 561 participants were included. Two trials compared individualized home exercise programs with no intervention. Low quality evidence for effects in favor of the home exercise program was found in physical function and spinal mobility [absolute benefit 10.3 cm on fingertip to floor distance; relative percentage difference (RPD) 37%)]. Further, the trials showed low quality evidence for no group differences in pain. Three trials compared supervised group physiotherapy with an individualized home exercise program. Moderate quality evidence for effectiveness was found in patient global assessment and spinal mobility in favor of the supervised group. The trials showed moderate quality evidence for no differences in pain intensity between the groups. One trial compared a 3-week inpatientspa-exercise therapy followed by weekly outpatient group physiotherapy with weekly outpatient group physiotherapy alone. Moderate quality evidence was found for effects in pain (absolute benefit 0.9 cm on visual analog scale; RPD 19%), physical function (absolute benefit 1 cm; RPD 24%), and patient global assessment (absolute benefit 1.3 cm; RPD 27%), in favor of the combined spa-exercise therapy. CONCLUSION: The current best available evidence suggests that physiotherapy is beneficial for people with AS. However, it is still not clear which treatment protocol should be recommended in the management of AS.
Authors: Josef Hermann; Thomas Müller; Babak Yazdani-Biuki; Martin Aringer; Manfred Herold; Wolfgang Ebner; Petra Ofner; Winfried Graninger Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Medhat Shehata; Josef D Schwarzmeier; Martin Hilgarth; Dita Demirtas; Dorothea Richter; Rainer Hubmann; Petra Boeck; Guenther Leiner; Albrecht Falkenbach Journal: Wien Klin Wochenschr Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 1.704
Authors: Hana Hulejová; Andrea Levitová; Markéta Kuklová; Jan Stochl; Martin Haluzík; Karel Pavelka; Jiří Vencovský; Ladislav Senolt Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2011-05-28 Impact factor: 2.980