Literature DB >> 16206289

Efficiency of the revised Bethesda guidelines (2003) for the detection of mutations in mismatch repair genes in Austrian HNPCC patients.

Brigitte Wolf1, Silke Gruber, Silvia Henglmueller, Sonja Kappel, Michael Bergmann, Friedrich Wrba, Judith Karner-Hanusch.   

Abstract

The clinical diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is based on the Amsterdam II criteria (ACII). The purpose of using the Bethesda guidelines (BG) is to select tumours for microsatellite analysis. Recently, the modified Amsterdam criteria (ACmod) and Bethesda guidelines (BGmod) were proposed to simplify definitions. We evaluated the efficiency of the ACmod and BGmod to identify patients with germ-line mutations in MLH1 and MSH2 in 81 unrelated Austrian HNPCC families. Microsatellite (MS) analysis was performed in 55 tumours. The new criteria included more families than the old ones: BGmod, n = 81; BG, n = 72; ACmod, n = 52 and ACII, n = 35. The more stringent old criteria tended to show greater positive predictive value for association with a germ-line mutation than the corresponding new criteria: BGmod, 23%; BG, 26%; ACmod, 31% and ACII, 37%. The larger number of patients analysed in the ACmod group resulted in greater sensitivity compared to the ACII. The increased workload for BGmod was not associated with greater sensitivity. Microsatellite instability (MSI) significantly enhanced specificity in all subgroups. We recommend the use of the ACmod criteria to select patients for primary sequence analysis, when microsatellite analysis is not possible. If the BG are used, we suggest that BG be given preference over BGmod, as the former signify a lesser workload.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16206289     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  4 in total

1.  MYH biallelic mutation can inactivate the two genetic pathways of colorectal cancer by APC or MLH1 transversions.

Authors:  Jérémie H Lefevre; Chrystelle Colas; Florence Coulet; Carolina Bonilla; Najat Mourra; Jean-Francois Flejou; Emmanuel Tiret; Walter Bodmer; Florent Soubrier; Yann Parc
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Proficiency of DNA repair genes and microsatellite instability in operated colorectal cancer patients with clinical suspicion of lynch syndrome.

Authors:  Isabella Nicácio de Freitas; Fábio Guilherm Caserta Maryssael de Campos; Venâncio Avancini Ferreira Alves; Juliana Magalhães Cavalcante; Dirce Carraro; Renata de Almeida Coudry; Márcio Augusto Diniz; Sérgio Carlos Nahas; Ulysses Ribeiro
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-12

Review 3.  A review on the molecular diagnostics of Lynch syndrome: a central role for the pathology laboratory.

Authors:  Margot G F van Lier; Anja Wagner; Monique E van Leerdam; Katharina Biermann; Ernst J Kuipers; Ewout W Steyerberg; Hendrikus Jan Dubbink; Winand N M Dinjens
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 5.310

4.  Observational Study: Familial Relevance and Oncological Significance of Revised Bethesda Guidelines in Colorectal Patients That Have Undergone Curative Resection.

Authors:  Won Beom Jung; Chan Wook Kim; Yong Sik Yoon; In Ja Park; Seok-Byung Lim; Chang Sik Yu; Jin Cheon Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.