Literature DB >> 16206287

Modeling tumor predisposing FH mutations in yeast: effects on fumarase activity, growth phenotype and gene expression profile.

Antti Kokko1, Sanna S K Ylisaukko-Oja, Maija Kiuru, Maarit S Takatalo, Paula Salmikangas, Jarno Tuimala, Diego Arango, Auli Karhu, Lauri A Aaltonen, Jussi Jäntti.   

Abstract

Heterozygous mutations in the fumarase (FH) gene cause the tumor predisposition syndrome hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer (MIM 605839). While most families segregate a benign phenotype of multiple leiomyomas, others display a phenotype with early-onset renal cancer and leiomyosarcoma. Modifier genes may play a role in this, but an alternative explanation is simple genotype-phenotype association. FH mutations predisposing to cancer appear to be truncating or in fully conserved amino acids, suggesting that mutations severely affecting FH activity might predispose to malignancy. In the present study, we analyzed 2 conserved fumarase mutations in yeast. H153R has been described in 3 cancer predisposition families; whereas all 3 reported K187R families have displayed the benign phenotype. Examining H153R and K187R should clarify whether cancer-related FH mutations differ from their benign phenotype-associated counterparts. Yeast strains containing the 2 mutations, and knockout and wild type (WT) references, were created and the growth phenotypes studied on selected carbon sources to assess mitochondrial function. Additionally, Fum1 protein production and activity were measured, and the strains were subjected to transcriptional profiling. On nonfermentable lactate medium, the fumarase knockout strains did not grow, whereas the mutants showed no differences, as compared to WT yeast. Although both mutant strains produced fumarase, a considerable decrease in enzyme activity was seen in mutants with respect to WT. Transcription of the majority of Krebs cycle enzymes was downregulated in response to mutations in fumarase. In conclusion, both mutants displayed some, albeit greatly reduced, fumarase activity. This activity was sufficient to support normal growth on nonfermentable carbon source, unlike the deletion phenotype, demonstrating the significance of the residual activity. The findings support the hypothesis that modifier gene(s), rather than phenotype-genotype effects, display a major role in determining tumor phenotypes in families segregating FH mutations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16206287     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  4 in total

1.  Flux balance analysis of barley seeds: a computational approach to study systemic properties of central metabolism.

Authors:  Eva Grafahrend-Belau; Falk Schreiber; Dirk Koschützki; Björn H Junker
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Fumarase: a mitochondrial metabolic enzyme and a cytosolic/nuclear component of the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Ohad Yogev; Orli Yogev; Esti Singer; Eitan Shaulian; Michal Goldberg; Thomas D Fox; Ophry Pines
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-03-09       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Fumarate hydratase deficiency in renal cancer induces glycolytic addiction and hypoxia-inducible transcription factor 1alpha stabilization by glucose-dependent generation of reactive oxygen species.

Authors:  Sunil Sudarshan; Carole Sourbier; Hye-Sik Kong; Karen Block; Vladimir A Valera Romero; Youfeng Yang; Cynthia Galindo; Mehdi Mollapour; Bradley Scroggins; Norman Goode; Min-Jung Lee; Campbell W Gourlay; Jane Trepel; W Marston Linehan; Len Neckers
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Bacterial fumarase and L-malic acid are evolutionary ancient components of the DNA damage response.

Authors:  Esti Singer; Yardena Bh Silas; Sigal Ben-Yehuda; Ophry Pines
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 8.140

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.