BACKGROUND: The current cadaver study was performed to evaluate and compare infraspinatus (ISP) vs. subscapularis (SSC) tendon transfer used for the repair of a large supraspinatus (SSP) rotator cuff defect. The main outcome measures were the range of motion and intramuscular length changes during motion. METHODS: Thirteen fresh-frozen cadaver shoulders were used in the study. A supraspinatus defect extending to the apex of the humeral head (Patte size II) was created. Transosseous repair was then attempted with the ISP and with the SSC in all cases; intramuscular length changes were measured by Hall effect transducers during motion of the arm in steps of 30 degrees. RESULTS: Repair was successful in all cases when the ISP was used, while use of the SSC resulted in a successful repair in only 8 of the 13 (61.5%). Passive range of motion did not differ between ISP and SSC. ISP was shortened during flexion and abduction in contrast to the SSC that was lengthened during flexion (p<0.05) and shortened to a lesser degree (p<0.05). Length changes during rotation were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaver model the ISP proved more favorable than the SSC for covering a Patte size II SSP defect if the assumption is true that lengthening of a muscle is less favorable than shortening because of the vascularization of the tendon.
BACKGROUND: The current cadaver study was performed to evaluate and compare infraspinatus (ISP) vs. subscapularis (SSC) tendon transfer used for the repair of a large supraspinatus (SSP) rotator cuff defect. The main outcome measures were the range of motion and intramuscular length changes during motion. METHODS: Thirteen fresh-frozen cadaver shoulders were used in the study. A supraspinatus defect extending to the apex of the humeral head (Patte size II) was created. Transosseous repair was then attempted with the ISP and with the SSC in all cases; intramuscular length changes were measured by Hall effect transducers during motion of the arm in steps of 30 degrees. RESULTS: Repair was successful in all cases when the ISP was used, while use of the SSC resulted in a successful repair in only 8 of the 13 (61.5%). Passive range of motion did not differ between ISP and SSC. ISP was shortened during flexion and abduction in contrast to the SSC that was lengthened during flexion (p<0.05) and shortened to a lesser degree (p<0.05). Length changes during rotation were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaver model the ISP proved more favorable than the SSC for covering a Patte size II SSP defect if the assumption is true that lengthening of a muscle is less favorable than shortening because of the vascularization of the tendon.