Roger Dmochowski1, David Staskin. 1. Department of Urologic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA. roger.dmochowski@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mixed incontinence remains a problematic issue in clinical practice. Interventions designed to benefit one of the contributory symptoms often do no benefit the other constituent symptom. Recent evolution in the taxonomy of mixed incontinence as well as the increased reporting of standardized results has produced a better understanding of the response of this entity to clinical interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Three main areas of development have occurred in the analysis of mixed incontinence. The advancements in definitional and taxonomic changes have clarified the concept and presentation of mixed incontinence. In light of these changes, results reported from pharmacologic or surgical interventions have improved. Several new studies have demonstrated the efficacy of these interventions in selected groups of patients using either pharmacologic or operative modalities. SUMMARY: In well selected and symptomatically characterized patients, therapy directed at mixed incontinence can provide efficacious results. The implications of these positive outcomes suggest that therapy founded on appropriate symptomatic appraisal can produce generally salubrious outcomes. These outcomes must, however, be assessed with tools that allow adequate differentiation of symptomatic changes including methods that delineate not only cure but also symptom improvement.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Mixed incontinence remains a problematic issue in clinical practice. Interventions designed to benefit one of the contributory symptoms often do no benefit the other constituent symptom. Recent evolution in the taxonomy of mixed incontinence as well as the increased reporting of standardized results has produced a better understanding of the response of this entity to clinical interventions. RECENT FINDINGS: Three main areas of development have occurred in the analysis of mixed incontinence. The advancements in definitional and taxonomic changes have clarified the concept and presentation of mixed incontinence. In light of these changes, results reported from pharmacologic or surgical interventions have improved. Several new studies have demonstrated the efficacy of these interventions in selected groups of patients using either pharmacologic or operative modalities. SUMMARY: In well selected and symptomatically characterized patients, therapy directed at mixed incontinence can provide efficacious results. The implications of these positive outcomes suggest that therapy founded on appropriate symptomatic appraisal can produce generally salubrious outcomes. These outcomes must, however, be assessed with tools that allow adequate differentiation of symptomatic changes including methods that delineate not only cure but also symptom improvement.
Authors: Linda Brubaker; Emily S Lukacz; Kathryn Burgio; Philippe Zimmern; Peggy Norton; Wendy Leng; Harry Johnson; Stephen Kraus; Anne Stoddard Journal: Neurourol Urodyn Date: 2011-01 Impact factor: 2.696
Authors: Yuko M Komesu; Holly E Richter; Darrell L Dinwiddie; Nazema Y Siddiqui; Vivian W Sung; Emily S Lukacz; Beri Ridgeway; Lily A Arya; Halina M Zyczynski; Rebecca G Rogers; Marie Gantz Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Vivian W Sung; Diane Borello-France; Gena Dunivan; Marie Gantz; Emily S Lukacz; Pamela Moalli; Diane K Newman; Holly E Richter; Beri Ridgeway; Ariana L Smith; Alison C Weidner; Susan Meikle Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Vivian W Sung; Diane Borello-France; Diane K Newman; Holly E Richter; Emily S Lukacz; Pamela Moalli; Alison C Weidner; Ariana L Smith; Gena Dunivan; Beri Ridgeway; John N Nguyen; Donna Mazloomdoost; Benjamin Carper; Marie G Gantz Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 56.272