Literature DB >> 16204873

Jet formation and shock wave emission during collapse of ultrasound-induced cavitation bubbles and their role in the therapeutic applications of high-intensity focused ultrasound.

E A Brujan1, T Ikeda, Y Matsumoto.   

Abstract

The dynamics of inertial cavitation bubbles produced by short pulses of high-intensity focused ultrasound near a rigid boundary are studied to get a better understanding of the role of jet formation and shock wave emission during bubble collapse in the therapeutic applications of ultrasound. The bubble dynamics are investigated by high-speed photography with up to 2 million frames/s and acoustic measurements, as well as by numerical calculations. The significant parameter of this study is the dimensionless stand-off, gamma, which is defined as the distance of the bubble centre at its maximum expansion scaled by the maximum bubble radius. High-speed photography is applied to observe the bubble motion and the velocity of the liquid jet formed during bubble collapse. Hydrophone measurements are used to determine the pressure and the duration of the shock wave emitted during bubble rebound. Calculations yield the variation with time of the bubble wall, the maximum velocity and the kinetic energy of the re-entrant jet. The comparisons between experimental and numerical data are favourable with regard to both shape history and translational motion of the bubble. The acoustic energy constitutes the largest individual amount in the energy balance of bubble collapse. The ratio of the shock wave energy, measured at 10 mm from the emission centre, to the cavitation bubble energy was 1:2.4 at gamma = 1.55 and 1:3.5 at gamma = 1. At this distance, the shock wave pressure ranges from 0.122 MPa, at gamma = 1, to 0.162 MPa, at gamma = 1.55, and the temporal duration at the half maximum level is 87 ns. The maximum jet velocity ranges from 27 m s(-1), at gamma = 1, to 36 m s(-1), at gamma = 1.55. For gamma < 1.2, the re-entrant jet can generate an impact pressure on the nearby boundary larger than 50 MPa. We discuss the implications of the results for the therapeutic applications of high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16204873     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/20/004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  14 in total

1.  Shock Wave-Induced Damage of a Protein by Void Collapse.

Authors:  Edmond Y Lau; Max L Berkowitz; Eric Schwegler
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  The influence of distance between microbubbles on the fluid flow produced during ultrasound exposure.

Authors:  Carolyn E Schutt; Stuart D Ibsen; William Thrift; Sadik C Esener
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  High-intensity focused ultrasound sonothrombolysis: the use of perfluorocarbon droplets to achieve clot lysis at reduced acoustic power.

Authors:  Daniel Pajek; Alison Burgess; Yuexi Huang; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Transendothelial Perforations and the Sphere of Influence of Single-Site Sonoporation.

Authors:  Brandon Helfield; Xucai Chen; Simon C Watkins; Flordeliza S Villanueva
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-05-10       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Probability of cavitation for single ultrasound pulses applied to tissues and tissue-mimicking materials.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Charles A Cain; Timothy L Hall; J Brian Fowlkes; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 2.998

6.  Noninvasive thrombolysis using pulsed ultrasound cavitation therapy - histotripsy.

Authors:  Adam D Maxwell; Charles A Cain; Alexander P Duryea; Lingqian Yuan; Hitinder S Gurm; Zhen Xu
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2009-10-24       Impact factor: 2.998

7.  Efficacy of Sonothrombolysis Using Microbubbles Produced by a Catheter-Based Microfluidic Device in a Rat Model of Ischemic Stroke.

Authors:  Adam J Dixon; Jun Li; John-Marschner Robert Rickel; Alexander L Klibanov; Zhiyi Zuo; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  In Vitro Sonothrombolysis Enhancement by Transiently Stable Microbubbles Produced by a Flow-Focusing Microfluidic Device.

Authors:  Adam J Dixon; John Marschner Robert Rickel; Brian D Shin; Alexander L Klibanov; John A Hossack
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 9.  The effect of ultrasound cavitation on endothelial cells.

Authors:  Madhumithra Subramanian Karthikesh; Xinmai Yang
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2021-01-18

10.  Targeting of liposomes via PSGL1 for enhanced tumor accumulation.

Authors:  Robert Carlisle; Leonard W Seymour; Constantin C Coussios
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 4.200

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.