BACKGROUND: Having been breast-fed has been suggested to influence cancer risk in adulthood. We investigated associations between breast-feeding during infancy and adult cancer incidence and mortality in a cohort study and meta-analyses of published studies. METHODS: The Boyd Orr cohort consisted of 4999 subjects who were originally surveyed in 1937-39, when they were 0-19 years of age. Cancer outcomes from 1948 through 2003 were available for 4379 (88%) subjects, and 3844 had complete data on all covariates. Associations of breast-feeding with cancer were investigated using proportional hazards models. We also identified 14 studies on infant feeding and cancer published from 1966 through July 2005, of which 10 could be combined with the Boyd Orr cohort results in a meta-analysis of breast cancer using random-effect models. RESULTS: In the Boyd Orr cohort, ever having been breast-fed, compared with never having been breast-fed, was not associated with the incidence of all cancers (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89 to 1.28) or of any individual cancer type examined (prostate HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.58 to 3.52; breast HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 0.89 to 2.94; colorectal HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.45 to 1.63; gastric HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.47 to 3.15). In the meta-analysis, there was also no association between breast-feeding and breast cancer (regardless of menopausal status) (relative risk [RR] = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.04). However, breast-fed women had a reduced risk of premenopausal breast cancer (RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.98) but not of postmenopausal breast cancer (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.16). CONCLUSION: Ever having been breast-fed was not associated with overall breast cancer risk, although the meta-analysis revealed a reduced risk of premenopausal breast cancer in women who had been breast-fed.
BACKGROUND: Having been breast-fed has been suggested to influence cancer risk in adulthood. We investigated associations between breast-feeding during infancy and adult cancer incidence and mortality in a cohort study and meta-analyses of published studies. METHODS: The Boyd Orr cohort consisted of 4999 subjects who were originally surveyed in 1937-39, when they were 0-19 years of age. Cancer outcomes from 1948 through 2003 were available for 4379 (88%) subjects, and 3844 had complete data on all covariates. Associations of breast-feeding with cancer were investigated using proportional hazards models. We also identified 14 studies on infant feeding and cancer published from 1966 through July 2005, of which 10 could be combined with the Boyd Orr cohort results in a meta-analysis of breast cancer using random-effect models. RESULTS: In the Boyd Orr cohort, ever having been breast-fed, compared with never having been breast-fed, was not associated with the incidence of all cancers (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.89 to 1.28) or of any individual cancer type examined (prostate HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 0.58 to 3.52; breast HR = 1.62, 95% CI = 0.89 to 2.94; colorectal HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.45 to 1.63; gastric HR = 1.22, 95% CI = 0.47 to 3.15). In the meta-analysis, there was also no association between breast-feeding and breast cancer (regardless of menopausal status) (relative risk [RR] = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.85 to 1.04). However, breast-fed women had a reduced risk of premenopausal breast cancer (RR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.79 to 0.98) but not of postmenopausal breast cancer (RR = 1.00, 95% CI = 0.86 to 1.16). CONCLUSION: Ever having been breast-fed was not associated with overall breast cancer risk, although the meta-analysis revealed a reduced risk of premenopausal breast cancer in women who had been breast-fed.
Authors: M-H Tao; C Marian; P G Shields; N Potischman; J Nie; S S Krishnan; D L Berry; B V Kallakury; C Ambrosone; S B Edge; M Trevisan; J Winston; J L Freudenheim Journal: J Dev Orig Health Dis Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.401
Authors: Fei Xue; Leena A Hilakivi-Clarke; G Larry Maxwell; Susan E Hankinson; Karin B Michels Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2008-06-09 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Hazel B Nichols; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Brian L Sprague; John M Hampton; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Polly A Newcomb Journal: Epidemiology Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 4.822
Authors: Elizabeth H Ruder; Joanne F Dorgan; Sibylle Kranz; Penny M Kris-Etherton; Terryl J Hartman Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Lauren A Wise; Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Polly A Newcomb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; John M Hampton; Kathleen M Egan Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2009-03-29 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Hazel B Nichols; Minouk J Schoemaker; Jianwen Cai; Jiawei Xu; Lauren B Wright; Mark N Brook; Michael E Jones; Hans-Olov Adami; Laura Baglietto; Kimberly A Bertrand; William J Blot; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Miren Dorronsoro; Laure Dossus; A Heather Eliassen; Graham G Giles; Inger T Gram; Susan E Hankinson; Judy Hoffman-Bolton; Rudolf Kaaks; Timothy J Key; Cari M Kitahara; Susanna C Larsson; Martha Linet; Melissa A Merritt; Roger L Milne; Valeria Pala; Julie R Palmer; Petra H Peeters; Elio Riboli; Malin Sund; Rulla M Tamimi; Anne Tjønneland; Antonia Trichopoulou; Giske Ursin; Lars Vatten; Kala Visvanathan; Elisabete Weiderpass; Alicja Wolk; Wei Zheng; Clarice R Weinberg; Anthony J Swerdlow; Dale P Sandler Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 25.391