Literature DB >> 16202850

Different normalizations for body size and population attributable risk of left ventricular hypertrophy: the MAVI study.

Giovanni de Simone1, Richard B Devereux, Aldo P Maggioni, Massimo Gorini, Oreste de Divitiis, Paolo Verdecchia.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different methods of normalizing left ventricular (LV) mass for body size identify generally similar relative risks of adverse cardiovascular outcome but with variable prevalences of LV hypertrophy (H). Preliminary results from a population with high prevalence of obesity suggest that the population attributable-risk percent (PAR%) of LVH is substantially higher when LV mass is normalized for allometric power of height.
METHODS: We calculated the PAR% of LVH by different definitions in the cohort of the MAssa Ventricolare sinistra nell' Ipertensione (MAVI) study (n = 1019, 62% women), a population with low prevalence of obesity (22%, with only 3% and 0.1% in class II and class III obesity, respectively). Composite fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events occurred in 53 participants (5.2%).
RESULTS: Prevalence of LVH was between 28% and 56%, with slight greater values for height-based normalization. Age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios were comprised between 1.37 and 1.44 for different measures of LV mass index. The PAR% was not meaningfully different among the different methods of normalization (between 47% and 56%), and height-based methods showed in general a performance similar to body surface area-based normalizations.
CONCLUSIONS: In a large clinical population of hypertensive subjects with low prevalence of obesity, population risk attributable to LV hypertrophy was not meaningfully different in relation to the type of normalization of LV mass for body size. Height-based methods perform as well as body surface area-based ones. We suggest that the prevalence of obesity in hypertensive populations might substantially influence differences in population risk attributable to LVH identified by different methods of normalizing LV mass.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16202850     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2005.05.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Hypertens        ISSN: 0895-7061            Impact factor:   2.689


  13 in total

1.  Left ventricular mass: allometric scaling, normative values, effect of obesity, and prognostic performance.

Authors:  Julio A Chirinos; Patrick Segers; Marc L De Buyzere; Richard A Kronmal; Muhammad W Raja; Dirk De Bacquer; Tom Claessens; Thierry C Gillebert; Martin St John-Sutton; Ernst R Rietzschel
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  Method errors or unexplained biological information?

Authors:  Giovanni de Simone; Richard B Devereux
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 10.190

3.  Bias related to body mass index in pediatric echocardiographic Z scores.

Authors:  Frederic Dallaire; Jean-Luc Bigras; Milan Prsa; Nagib Dahdah
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 1.655

4.  Framingham score and LV mass predict events in young adults: CARDIA study.

Authors:  Anderson C Armstrong; David R Jacobs; Samuel S Gidding; Laura A Colangelo; Ola Gjesdal; Cora E Lewis; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Stephen Sidney; Pamela J Schreiner; O D Williams; David C Goff; Kiang Liu; Joao A C Lima
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 4.164

Review 5.  LV mass assessed by echocardiography and CMR, cardiovascular outcomes, and medical practice.

Authors:  Anderson C Armstrong; Samuel Gidding; Ola Gjesdal; Colin Wu; David A Bluemke; João A C Lima
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-08

Review 6.  Echocardiography in Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Giovanni de Simone; Costantino Mancusi; Roberta Esposito; Nicola De Luca; Maurizio Galderisi
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2018-05-02

7.  Left ventricular mass, abdominal circumference and age: the Fels longitudinal study.

Authors:  W C Chumlea; C M Schubert; B Towne; R M Siervogel; S S Sun
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.075

8.  Body size adjustments for left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and their impact on left ventricular hypertrophy classification.

Authors:  Lyndia C Brumback; Richard Kronmal; Susan R Heckbert; Hanyu Ni; W Gregory Hundley; João A Lima; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 2.357

9.  Echocardiographic diagnoses in HIV-infected patients presenting with cardiac symptoms at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Pilly Chillo; Myhammad Bakari; Johnson Lwakatare
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 1.167

10.  Body Mass Index or Microalbuminuria, Which One is More Important for the Prediction and Prevention of Diastolic Dysfunction in Non-diabetic Hypertensive Patients?

Authors:  Hasan Shemirani; Alireza Khosravi; Rohola Hemmati; Mojgan Gharipour
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2012-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.