Literature DB >> 16202460

Prevalence of Salmonella spp. on Canadian pig farms using liquid or dry-feeding.

Abdolvahab Farzan1, Robert M Friendship, Catherine E Dewey, Keith Warriner, Cornelius Poppe, Kim Klotins.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether the shedding and antibody titre to Salmonella was lower for pig herds provided liquid-feed compared to those on traditional dry rations. Twenty liquid-feeding farms and 61 dry-feeding farms were selected. The amount of antibodies to Salmonella in sera from 15 finisher pigs on each of 80 Ontario swine farms was analyzed by means of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). In addition, the presence of Salmonella on the 20 liquid-feeding farms and 21 of the dry-feeding farms was assessed by culture of 15 fecal samples taken directly from finisher pigs and five pooled pen-fecal samples at each farm. A cut-off of OD% 10 was used. The Salmonella sero-prevalence differed between the two groups of farms. At least one pig tested sero-positive on 98% of the dry-feeding farms and 84% of the liquid-feeding farms (P<0.05). A multi-variable mixed linear regression model with the farm as a random variable and farm factors as the fixed effects was fitted. Crude optical density (OD) of the individual pig was considered as the continuous dependent variable. Dry-feeding and antimicrobial daily usage was associated with crude OD (P<0.05). In addition, crude OD increased with increasing herd size (P<0.05). Salmonella was isolated from 25 out of 420 fecal samples (6%) from dry-feeding farms compared to three out of 400 samples (0.8%) from liquid-feeding farms. Eight of the dry-feeding farms (38%) tested positive compared to only three of the liquid-feeding farms (15%). Salmonella was also recovered from the pen environment on five dry-feeding farms but were not isolated from the facilities using liquid-feeding. Salmonella Typhimurium was isolated from four farms in the dry-feed group and on one farm with liquid-feeding. The one S. Typhimurium isolate from the liquid-feeding farm exhibited no antimicrobial resistance, but those from dry-feeding farms were resistant to four or more antimicrobial agents. The results of the logistic regression, with farm as a random effect showed that dry-feeding [OR=2.7 (1.1-15.1)] and continuous flow system [OR=2.3 (1.2-12.7)] increased risk of finding Salmonella in the individual pig. These findings indicate that liquid-feeding and all-in all-out management of the grower-finisher barns can reduce the Salmonella prevalence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16202460     DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2005.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Vet Med        ISSN: 0167-5877            Impact factor:   2.670


  7 in total

1.  Distribution of Salmonella serovars in breeding, nursery, and grow-to-finish pigs, and risk factors for shedding in ten farrow-to-finish swine farms in Alberta and Saskatchewan.

Authors:  Wendy Wilkins; Andrijana Rajić; Cheryl Waldner; Margaret McFall; Eva Chow; Anne Muckle; Leigh Rosengren
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.310

2.  Salmonella enterica in commercial swine feed and subsequent isolation of phenotypically and genotypically related strains from fecal samples.

Authors:  Bayleyegn Molla; Allyson Sterman; Jennifer Mathews; Valeria Artuso-Ponte; Melanie Abley; William Farmer; Päivi Rajala-Schultz; W E Morgan Morrow; Wondwossen A Gebreyes
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Distribution of Salmonella serovars and phage types on 80 Ontario swine farms in 2004.

Authors:  Abdolvahab Farzan; Robert M Friendship; Catherine E Dewey; Anne C Muckle; Jeff T Gray; Julie Funk
Journal:  Can J Vet Res       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.310

4.  Comparative phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Salmonella spp. in pig farms and slaughterhouses in two provinces in northern Thailand.

Authors:  Pakpoom Tadee; Phacharaporn Boonkhot; Srirat Pornruangwong; Prapas Patchanee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Pig Farmers' Perceptions of Economic Incentives to Control Salmonella Prevalence at Herd Level.

Authors:  Jakob Vesterlund Olsen; Tove Christensen; Jørgen Dejgaard Jensen
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-16

Review 6.  The Evidence for a Causal Link Between Disease and Damaging Behavior in Pigs.

Authors:  Laura A Boyle; Sandra A Edwards; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Françoise Pol; Manja Zupan Šemrov; Sabine Schütze; Janicke Nordgreen; Nadya Bozakova; Evangelia N Sossidou; Anna Valros
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-01-27

Review 7.  Prevalence and risk factors for bacterial food-borne zoonotic hazards in slaughter pigs: a review.

Authors:  J Fosse; H Seegers; C Magras
Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 2.702

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.