Literature DB >> 16201056

Poverty, food programs, and childhood obesity.

Sandra L Hofferth1, Sally Curtin.   

Abstract

Sixteen percent of children 6-11 years of age were classified as overweight in 1999-2002, four times the percentage in 1965. Although poverty has traditionally been associated with underweight as a result of poor diet, researchers have recently pointed to a paradox in the U.S., which is that low income and obesity can coexist in the same population. This paper first examines whether income is linked to overweight in school-age children. Second, it explores whether food programs such as the Food Stamp Program, the National School Lunch Program, and the School Breakfast Program are associated with overweight among children in different income groups. The data come from the nationally representative 1997 Panel Study of Income Dynamics Child Development Supplement. No evidence either that poor children are more likely to be overweight or that food programs contribute to overweight among poor children was found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16201056     DOI: 10.1002/pam.20134

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Policy Anal Manage        ISSN: 0276-8739


  22 in total

1.  Maternal and familial correlates of anthropometric typologies in the nutrition transition of Colombia, 2000-2010.

Authors:  Diana C Parra; Luis F Gomez; Lora Iannotti; Debra Haire-Joshu; Anne K Sebert Kuhlmann; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  SNAP Participation and Diet-Sensitive Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Adolescents.

Authors:  Cindy W Leung; June M Tester; Eric B Rimm; Walter C Willett
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Food insecurity and obesity: research gaps, opportunities, and challenges.

Authors:  Alison G M Brown; Layla E Esposito; Rachel A Fisher; Holly L Nicastro; Derrick C Tabor; Jenelle R Walker
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Nonsignificant relationship between participation in school-provided meals and body mass index during the fourth-grade school year.

Authors:  Amy E Paxton; Suzanne Domel Baxter; Joshua M Tebbs; Julie A Royer; Caroline H Guinn; Christina M Devlin; Christopher J Finney
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.910

5.  Childhood overweight and family income.

Authors:  David S Freedman; Cynthia L Ogden; Katherine M Flegal; Laura Kettel Khan; Mary K Serdula; William H Dietz
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2007-05-03

6.  Children's body mass index, participation in school meals, and observed energy intake at school meals.

Authors:  Suzanne Domel Baxter; James W Hardin; Caroline H Guinn; Julie A Royer; Alyssa J Mackelprang; Christina M Devlin
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 6.457

7.  Are you what your mother weighs? Evaluating the impact of maternal weight trajectories on youth overweight.

Authors:  Lori Kowaleski-Jones; Barbara B Brown; Jessie X Fan; Ken R Smith; Cathleen D Zick
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2009-07-07

8.  Federal Food Assistance Programs and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Low-Income Preschool Children.

Authors:  Paige Johnson; Michele Montgomery; Patrick Ewell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-06

9.  Association between state laws governing school meal nutrition content and student weight status: implications for new USDA school meal standards.

Authors:  Daniel R Taber; Jamie F Chriqui; Lisa Powell; Frank J Chaloupka
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 16.193

10.  Misclassification of fourth-grade children's participation in school-provided meals based on parental responses relative to administrative daily records.

Authors:  Suzanne Domel Baxter; Amy E Paxton-Aiken; Julie A Royer; David B Hitchcock; Caroline H Guinn; Christopher J Finney
Journal:  J Acad Nutr Diet       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 4.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.