Literature DB >> 16200643

Activity and plasticity in the CA1, the dentate gyrus, and the amygdala following controllable vs. uncontrollable water stress.

Alexandra Kavushansky1, Rose-Marie Vouimba, Hagit Cohen, Gal Richter-Levin.   

Abstract

The level of controllability has been shown to modulate the effects of stress on physiology and behavior. In the present study, we investigated the effects of controllable vs. uncontrollable stressors on plasticity in hippocampal CA1, the dentate gyrus (DG), and basal amygdala nucleus (B) in the rat, using the electrophysiological procedure of long-term potentiation (LTP). A naive group was left undisturbed until the electrophysiological recording commenced. Rats of the two controllable stress groups were trained in the Morris water maze to locate an invisible underwater platform (the first group), or visible platform (the second group), thus escaping from the water, before the recording. The uncontrollable stress group underwent the same procedure (exposure time to water was adjusted to the averaged exposure time of the first controllable group) without the escape platform. We first assessed the effects of stress and controllability on LTP in CA1. Both controllable stressors and the uncontrollable stress impaired CA1 LTP, with a more robust effect induced by the uncontrollable stress. We further assessed the effects of the same procedures on LTP in DG and B. The uncontrollable stress enhanced LTP in DG and increased baseline responses (suggesting uncontrollable stress-induced plasticity) in the amygdala. All the stressors decreased amygdalar LTP. An assessment of plasma levels of corticosterone (CORT), following the behavioral procedures, revealed an enhancement in CORT release following the uncontrollable, but not controllable stress, indicating the uncontrollable condition as the most stressful. These findings provide insight into the differential effects of stress and stress controllability on different hippocampal subregions and the amygdala. Copyright 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16200643     DOI: 10.1002/hipo.20130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hippocampus        ISSN: 1050-9631            Impact factor:   3.899


  37 in total

1.  Acute stress impairs hippocampal mossy fiber-CA3 long-term potentiation by enhancing cAMP-specific phosphodiesterase 4 activity.

Authors:  Chien-Chung Chen; Chih-Hao Yang; Chiung-Chun Huang; Kuei-Sen Hsu
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 2.  Dissecting the age-related decline on spatial learning and memory tasks in rodent models: N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors and voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels in senescent synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Thomas C Foster
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2012-01-28       Impact factor: 11.685

3.  Neurofascin Knock Down in the Basolateral Amygdala Mediates Resilience of Memory and Plasticity in the Dorsal Dentate Gyrus Under Stress.

Authors:  Rinki Saha; Martin Kriebel; Hansjürgen Volkmer; Gal Richter-Levin; Anne Albrecht
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Learning-induced changes in mPFC-BLA connections after fear conditioning, extinction, and reinstatement of fear.

Authors:  Rose-Marie Vouimba; Mouna Maroun
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Effects of repeated stress on excitatory drive of basal amygdala neurons in vivo.

Authors:  Mallika Padival; Danielle Quinette; J Amiel Rosenkranz
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 7.853

6.  Cumulative activation during positive and negative events and state anxiety predicts subsequent inertia of amygdala reactivity.

Authors:  Swann Pichon; Ewa A Miendlarzewska; Hamdi Eryilmaz; Patrik Vuilleumier
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Expression of fibroblast growth factor-2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in the medial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus after uncontrollable or controllable stress.

Authors:  S T Bland; J P Tamlyn; R M Barrientos; B N Greenwood; L R Watkins; S Campeau; H E Day; S F Maier
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-12-29       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  The effects of two forms of physical activity on eyeblink classical conditioning.

Authors:  John T Green; Amy C Chess; Montana Burns; Kira M Schachinger; Alexandra Thanellou
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Glucocorticoid actions on synapses, circuits, and behavior: implications for the energetics of stress.

Authors:  Brent Myers; Jessica M McKlveen; James P Herman
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 8.606

10.  Acute episodes of predator exposure in conjunction with chronic social instability as an animal model of post-traumatic stress disorder.

Authors:  Phillip R Zoladz; Cheryl D Conrad; Monika Fleshner; David M Diamond
Journal:  Stress       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 3.493

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.