OBJECTIVE: To identify a finer level of antibody specificity for risk of congenital heart block (CHB) than reactivity to 52-kd SSA/Ro (Ro 52). METHODS: Serum from mothers enrolled in the Research Registry for Neonatal Lupus and the observational PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) study was evaluated for reactivity against peptide aa200-239 of Ro 52 (p200), recently reported to be associated with a higher risk of CHB. RESULTS: The majority of 156 Ro 52-positive sera tested were reactive with p200 (>3 SD above control), irrespective of the clinical status of the child. Optical density (OD) values of p200 did not differ significantly among mothers of children with CHB (mean +/- SD 0.187 +/- 0.363), mothers of children with rash (mean +/- SD 0.176 +/- 0.356), and mothers of children without neonatal lupus (mean +/- SD 0.229 +/- 0.315). Reactivity against p200 was found in 80 of 104 mothers of children with CHB (77%), 24 of 30 mothers of children with rash (80%), and 21 of 22 mothers who delivered healthy children and had no children with neonatal lupus (95%) (P not significant for all comparisons). Sera from 4 mothers of children with CHB with varied p200 titers (OD range 0.025-1.818) bound to the surface of non-permeabilized apoptotic, but not proliferating, human fetal cardiocytes. In 32 Ro 52-positive women who completed the PRIDE study (22 with no child with neonatal lupus, 7 with a child with CHB, and 3 with a child with rash) in whom p200 levels were determined during pregnancy, the correlation between level of p200 (OD range 0.000-1.170) and maximal fetal PR interval (range 115-168 msec) was not significant (rho = 0.107, P = 0.58). CONCLUSION: Reactivity to p200 is a dominant but not uniform anti-Ro 52 response in women whose children have CHB. Since exposure to this antibody specificity was observed with a similar frequency in children without CHB born to mothers with anti-Ro 52, additional factors are necessary to convert risk to disease expression.
OBJECTIVE: To identify a finer level of antibody specificity for risk of congenital heart block (CHB) than reactivity to 52-kd SSA/Ro (Ro 52). METHODS: Serum from mothers enrolled in the Research Registry for Neonatal Lupus and the observational PR Interval and Dexamethasone Evaluation (PRIDE) study was evaluated for reactivity against peptide aa200-239 of Ro 52 (p200), recently reported to be associated with a higher risk of CHB. RESULTS: The majority of 156 Ro 52-positive sera tested were reactive with p200 (>3 SD above control), irrespective of the clinical status of the child. Optical density (OD) values of p200 did not differ significantly among mothers of children with CHB (mean +/- SD 0.187 +/- 0.363), mothers of children with rash (mean +/- SD 0.176 +/- 0.356), and mothers of children without neonatal lupus (mean +/- SD 0.229 +/- 0.315). Reactivity against p200 was found in 80 of 104 mothers of children with CHB (77%), 24 of 30 mothers of children with rash (80%), and 21 of 22 mothers who delivered healthy children and had no children with neonatal lupus (95%) (P not significant for all comparisons). Sera from 4 mothers of children with CHB with varied p200 titers (OD range 0.025-1.818) bound to the surface of non-permeabilized apoptotic, but not proliferating, human fetal cardiocytes. In 32 Ro 52-positive women who completed the PRIDE study (22 with no child with neonatal lupus, 7 with a child with CHB, and 3 with a child with rash) in whom p200 levels were determined during pregnancy, the correlation between level of p200 (OD range 0.000-1.170) and maximal fetal PR interval (range 115-168 msec) was not significant (rho = 0.107, P = 0.58). CONCLUSION: Reactivity to p200 is a dominant but not uniform anti-Ro 52 response in women whose children have CHB. Since exposure to this antibody specificity was observed with a similar frequency in children without CHB born to mothers with anti-Ro 52, additional factors are necessary to convert risk to disease expression.
Authors: Peter M Izmirly; Amit Saxena; Mimi Y Kim; Dan Wang; Sara K Sahl; Carolina Llanos; Deborah Friedman; Jill P Buyon Journal: Circulation Date: 2011-10-03 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ruben J Acherman; Deborah M Friedman; Jill P Buyon; Joel Schwartz; William J Castillo; Robert C Rollins; William N Evans Journal: Prenat Diagn Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 3.050
Authors: Carolina Llanos; Deborah M Friedman; Amit Saxena; Peter M Izmirly; Chung-E Tseng; Renata Dische; Rosanna G Abellar; Marc Halushka; Robert M Clancy; Jill P Buyon Journal: Rheumatology (Oxford) Date: 2012-02-03 Impact factor: 7.580
Authors: Ana Lleo; Christopher L Bowlus; Guo-Xiang Yang; Pietro Invernizzi; Mauro Podda; Judy Van de Water; Aftab A Ansari; Ross L Coppel; Howard J Worman; Gregory J Gores; M Eric Gershwin Journal: Hepatology Date: 2010-09 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: T L Rivera; P M Izmirly; B K Birnbaum; P Byrne; J B Brauth; M Katholi; M Y Kim; J Fischer; R M Clancy; J P Buyon Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2008-07-14 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: A Hoxha; A Ruffatti; A Ambrosi; V Ottosson; M Hedlund; L Ottosson; M Anandapadamanaban; M Sunnerhagen; S-E Sonesson; M Wahren-Herlenius Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 4.330