Literature DB >> 16200550

Measuring the effects of work loss on productivity with team production.

Sean Nicholson1, Mark V Pauly, Daniel Polsky, Claire Sharda, Helena Szrek, Marc L Berger.   

Abstract

Using data from a survey of 800 managers in 12 industries, we find empirical support for the hypothesis that the cost associated with missed work varies across jobs according to the ease with which a manager can find a perfect replacement for the absent worker, the extent to which the worker functions as part of a team, and the time sensitivity of the worker's output. We then estimate wage 'multipliers' for 35 different jobs, where the multiplier is defined as the cost to the firm of an absence as a proportion (often greater than one) of the absent worker's daily wage. The median multiplier is 1.28, which supports the view that the cost to the firm of missed work is often greater than the wage. Copyright 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16200550     DOI: 10.1002/hec.1052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  42 in total

1.  Measuring health-related productivity loss.

Authors:  Rebecca J Mitchell; Paul Bates
Journal:  Popul Health Manag       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  Variation in the methodological approach to productivity cost valuation: the case of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Paul Hanly; Rebecca Maguire; Frances Drummond; Linda Sharp
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2019-08-23

3.  Employer survey to estimate the productivity friction period.

Authors:  Kathleen Manipis; Stephen Goodall; Paul Hanly; Rosalie Viney; Alison Pearce
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-01-02

Review 4.  Productivity costs in economic evaluations: past, present, future.

Authors:  Marieke Krol; Werner Brouwer; Frans Rutten
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Estimating productivity costs in health economic evaluations: a review of instruments and psychometric evidence.

Authors:  Kenneth Tang
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  How to estimate productivity costs in economic evaluations.

Authors:  Marieke Krol; Werner Brouwer
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  Relationships between tinnitus and the prevalence of anxiety and depression.

Authors:  Jay M Bhatt; Neil Bhattacharyya; Harrison W Lin
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  The Valuation of Informal Care in Cost-of-Illness Studies: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Juan Oliva-Moreno; Marta Trapero-Bertran; Luz Maria Peña-Longobardo; Raúl Del Pozo-Rubio
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Uptake and costs of hypofractionated vs conventional whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in the United States, 2008-2013.

Authors:  Justin E Bekelman; Gosia Sylwestrzak; John Barron; Jinan Liu; Andrew J Epstein; Gary Freedman; Jennifer Malin; Ezekiel J Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Telephone screening, outreach, and care management for depressed workers and impact on clinical and work productivity outcomes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Philip S Wang; Gregory E Simon; Jerry Avorn; Francisca Azocar; Evette J Ludman; Joyce McCulloch; Maria Z Petukhova; Ronald C Kessler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.